Misplaced Pages

Talk:List of Planetes episodes: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:25, 14 February 2008 editAnmaFinotera (talk | contribs)107,494 edits nominating for delisting← Previous edit Revision as of 05:36, 17 February 2008 edit undoTheFarix (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers134,691 edits FL-Class for Featured ListNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
|currentstatus=FL |currentstatus=FL
}} }}
{{anime|class=FA}} {{WikiProject Anime and manga|class=FL}}





Revision as of 05:36, 17 February 2008

This template must be substituted. Replace {{FLRC ...}} with {{subst:FLRC ...}}.

Featured listList of Planetes episodes is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Misplaced Pages community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 22, 2006Featured list candidatePromoted
WikiProject iconAnime and manga FL‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga
FLThis article has been rated as FL-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.


Airdates

I am having dificulty locating the animes original airdates... Any ideas? --Cat out 18:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

individual episode images

It's been a while since I've looked at this article, and I gotta say... I liked it a LOT better with individual images for each episode. I noticed no discussion was brought up for this, not that it seems controversial or anything. The layout with individual images became the inspiration for many other articles I worked on, and I don't understand the reasoning to change it. I'm assuming related concerns such as this had something to do with it? I'm of the opinion of the others who found this table way to chunky, and even though the image use (of BOTH DVD covers and individual episode images) is in hot dispute, I'm going to be bold and reformat it. From the featured list discussion, it does not seem this would break it's status.. If it does please revert my edits, and I will bring it up for further discussion. -- Ned Scott 12:19, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

scratch that, I don't think I'm up for it tonight. And the issue seems to hot right now, and I'd rather the edit not be taken as an attack or me trying to prove a point. I'll work something out on my sandbox and maybe wait out the discussion about the Lost episodes. But yeah, I'm suprised this article reached feature status looking like this.. -- Ned Scott 12:21, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Err, I was thinking about it and I think I probably came off rather rude just now. I think I'm too hyped up from the Lost images debate. The article really isn't bad, although I do prefer the individual images. In all honesty, I think you've done a great job on the article, Cool Cat. Sorry if I was a dick. -- Ned Scott 15:38, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Oh dont worry. ;) --Cat out 11:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Remove images or lose featured list status

There is a discussion about Fair use images in featured lists at Wikipedia_talk:Featured_list_criteria#Fair_Use_images which may result in this list losing its featured list status. - Peregrine Fisher 23:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Done. --Ali'i 16:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Actually this has been done per discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard#Clean up for the featured ones (as opposed to the outdated link above), but good work Ali'i. Will (aka Wimt) 16:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, sorry 'bout that. --Ali'i 17:07, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
And undone. --GunnarRene 17:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
We need to look at these rationales.--GunnarRene 17:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

There is a discussion concerning the images on this list at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/List of Family Guy episodes#Clean_up_for_the_featured_ones. - Peregrine Fisher 18:54, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Please replace images

Please replace the images, this page is only a violation of a disputed reading of our policies. The only consensus that exists about this is that we are not going to change our rules to prohibit images in lists like this. See Misplaced Pages:Fair use criteria/Amendment 2. - Peregrine Fisher 21:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Needless to say I and many other editors disagree. As you well know, there is a lengthy discussion underway about this at WP:AN where you are welcome to make your voice heard. I would just note that your notion that there is not a consensus is irrelevant in that we are enforcing Foundation policies. As many have pointed out, if a proper Fair Use rationale is added for an image, the image is specifically described in the text and a minimal number of images are used, then this is alright. However, a list with pictures that are not even mentioned by the text is a decorative use and this is expressly forbidden by our Fair Use policy. Just because enforcement has been neglected on this article until now does not mean that this list of images is any more justifiable. Meanwhile, I suggest further discussion is made at AN. Will (aka Wimt) 21:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
The work needs to be described in the text. We don't need the text to say "this screenshot". A screenshot is similar to a quotation from a longer text - the quotation can be used to illustrate a relevant point without saying "this quotation". --GunnarRene 17:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Also, the idea that the images can be replaced with anything is rather silly. --GunnarRene 05:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Categories: