Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages/to do: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:18, 13 February 2008 editRichard001 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers24,850 edits Move← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:11, 17 February 2008 edit undoRichard001 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers24,850 edits Self assessment?Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:
	\|expand=		\|expand=
	*Expand ] a little bit - three detailed paragraphs would be good for an article of this length.		*Expand ] a little bit - three detailed paragraphs would be good for an article of this length.
			*Should there be something on Misplaced Pages assessment of itself - e.g. the assessment scheme, WikiProjects, featured articles, peer review etc?
	*Find references where called for		*Find references where called for
	\|disambiguation=		\|disambiguation=

Revision as of 07:11, 17 February 2008

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Expand : *Expand lead a little bit - three detailed paragraphs would be good for an article of this length.
- Should there be something on Misplaced Pages assessment of itself - e.g. the assessment scheme, WikiProjects, featured articles, peer review etc?
- Find references where called for
- Other : *Discuss changing the subject of the article to the broader quality of Misplaced Pages (reliability being a more narrow subject, see Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages#Article name
- Images: Perhaps a screenshot of a vandalized/inaccurate edit?