Misplaced Pages

Aïbeg and Serkis: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:18, 16 February 2008 editAramgar (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,592 edits Added disputed tag← Previous edit Revision as of 19:39, 17 February 2008 edit undoAramgar (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,592 edits rm unfounded statements of Runciman and Grousset. Not a significant view.Next edit →
Line 10: Line 10:


As a reply to the letter from Baiju, Innocent IV remitted to the envoys the letter known as '']''.<ref>Roux, Histoire de l'Empire Mongol, p.316: "Sergis et Aibeg were finally sent back on November 22, 1248, with an answer, known as ''Viam agnoscere veritatis''" (Original French quote: "Serbeg et Aibeg furent finalement congédiés le 22 Novembre 1248 avec une réponse, la lettre connue comme ''Viam agnoscere veritatis''").</ref> <ref>Setton, p.522 "The Pope's reply to Baidju's letter, ''Viam agnoscere veritatis'', dated November 22, 1248, and probably carried back by Aibeg and Sargis"</ref> According to historian Kenneth Setton, it "stated that Innocent IV had acted out of a sense of duty to let the true religion be known to the Mongols, and that he regretted the Mongols' perseverance in their errors and adjured them to cease their menaces."<ref>Setton, p.522</ref> The Pope appealed to the Mongols to stop their killing of Christians, while indicating no further interest in continuing the dialogue.<ref>Rachewiltz, p. 118. "In his letter the pontiff urged the Mongols to stop persevering in their errors and to end the slaughter, especially of Christians. There is not even a hint at a renewal of the dialogue with the Tartars."</ref> As a reply to the letter from Baiju, Innocent IV remitted to the envoys the letter known as '']''.<ref>Roux, Histoire de l'Empire Mongol, p.316: "Sergis et Aibeg were finally sent back on November 22, 1248, with an answer, known as ''Viam agnoscere veritatis''" (Original French quote: "Serbeg et Aibeg furent finalement congédiés le 22 Novembre 1248 avec une réponse, la lettre connue comme ''Viam agnoscere veritatis''").</ref> <ref>Setton, p.522 "The Pope's reply to Baidju's letter, ''Viam agnoscere veritatis'', dated November 22, 1248, and probably carried back by Aibeg and Sargis"</ref> According to historian Kenneth Setton, it "stated that Innocent IV had acted out of a sense of duty to let the true religion be known to the Mongols, and that he regretted the Mongols' perseverance in their errors and adjured them to cease their menaces."<ref>Setton, p.522</ref> The Pope appealed to the Mongols to stop their killing of Christians, while indicating no further interest in continuing the dialogue.<ref>Rachewiltz, p. 118. "In his letter the pontiff urged the Mongols to stop persevering in their errors and to end the slaughter, especially of Christians. There is not even a hint at a renewal of the dialogue with the Tartars."</ref>

According to Grousset, in the response he remitted to them the Pope deplored the delays in establishing a general alliance between the Christians and the Mongols.<ref>"Histoire des Croisades", René Grousset, p523: Grousset mentions the "response remitted to Aibag and Sargis" in which "he deplored the delays to the general agreement between Mongols and Christiandom" ("Innocent IV congédia Aibag and Sargis en leur remettant pour Baiju une réponse dans laquelle il déplorait les retards apportés à une entente générale des Mongols et de la Chrétienté.").</ref> Runciman also states that Aibeg and Sarkis returned to the Mongol realm in November 1248, "with complaints that nothing further was happening about the alliance".<ref>Runciman, p.259</ref>


Aïbeg and Serkis stayed at Lyon for about a year, before returning to the Mongol realm on November 22, 1248.<ref>Runciman, p.259</ref><ref>Roux, ''Histoire de l'Empire Mongol'', p.316</ref> Aïbeg and Serkis stayed at Lyon for about a year, before returning to the Mongol realm on November 22, 1248.<ref>Runciman, p.259</ref><ref>Roux, ''Histoire de l'Empire Mongol'', p.316</ref>
Line 23: Line 21:
==References== ==References==
* Jackson, Peter, ''Mongols and the West'' * Jackson, Peter, ''Mongols and the West''
* Grousset, Rene, ''Histoire des Croisades, III'', Tempus, 2006 edition, ISBN 226202569X
* Rachewiltz, I, ''Papal Envoys to the Great Khans'', Stanford University Press, 1971. * Rachewiltz, I, ''Papal Envoys to the Great Khans'', Stanford University Press, 1971.
* Roux, Jean-Paul, ''Histoire de l'Empire Mongol'', 1993, Fayard, ISBN 2213031649 * Roux, Jean-Paul, ''Histoire de l'Empire Mongol'', 1993, Fayard, ISBN 2213031649

Revision as of 19:39, 17 February 2008

This article's factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. (Learn how and when to remove this message)
"Serkis" redirects here. For other uses, see Sarkis.

Aïbeg and Serkis, also Aibeg and Sergis or Aïbäg and Särgis, were two embassadors sent by the Mongol ruler Baichu to Pope Innocent IV in 1247-1248. They were the first Mongol envoys to Europe.

Aïbeg ("Moon Prince") is thought to have been a Turcophone Christian, possibly Uighur, and Serkis (from the Christian name "Sergius") a Nestorian, possibly Syrian. Both were sent by Baichu , to accompany the 1245 embassy of the Dominican Ascelin of Lombardia back to Lyon, France. They stayed there for about a year.

Aïbeg and Serkis met with Innocent IV in 1248, and remitted to him a rather vexing letter from Baichu, expressing his difficulty in understanding the Pope's message, and asking for his submission:

"By the strength of the Kaghan, the word of Prince Baichu. You Pope, know that your messengers came to visit us and brought to us your letters. They made strange discourses to us, and we do not known if you ordered them to utter these words, and if they did so of their own accord..."

— Letter from Baichu to Pope Innocent IV, 1248

As a reply to the letter from Baiju, Innocent IV remitted to the envoys the letter known as Viam agnoscere veritatis. According to historian Kenneth Setton, it "stated that Innocent IV had acted out of a sense of duty to let the true religion be known to the Mongols, and that he regretted the Mongols' perseverance in their errors and adjured them to cease their menaces." The Pope appealed to the Mongols to stop their killing of Christians, while indicating no further interest in continuing the dialogue.

Aïbeg and Serkis stayed at Lyon for about a year, before returning to the Mongol realm on November 22, 1248.

See also

Notes

  1. Roux, p.316: "Ascelin of Cremone (...) had himself accompanied by two diplomats, a Christian turcophone, maybe Uighur, named Aibeg ("Moon Prince"), and a Nestorian, probably Syrian, Sergis".
  2. Runciman, p.259
  3. Roux, p.316
  4. Quoted in Roux, p.316
  5. Roux, Histoire de l'Empire Mongol, p.316: "Sergis et Aibeg were finally sent back on November 22, 1248, with an answer, known as Viam agnoscere veritatis" (Original French quote: "Serbeg et Aibeg furent finalement congédiés le 22 Novembre 1248 avec une réponse, la lettre connue comme Viam agnoscere veritatis").
  6. Setton, p.522 "The Pope's reply to Baidju's letter, Viam agnoscere veritatis, dated November 22, 1248, and probably carried back by Aibeg and Sargis"
  7. Setton, p.522
  8. Rachewiltz, p. 118. "In his letter the pontiff urged the Mongols to stop persevering in their errors and to end the slaughter, especially of Christians. There is not even a hint at a renewal of the dialogue with the Tartars."
  9. Runciman, p.259
  10. Roux, Histoire de l'Empire Mongol, p.316

References

  • Jackson, Peter, Mongols and the West
  • Rachewiltz, I, Papal Envoys to the Great Khans, Stanford University Press, 1971.
  • Roux, Jean-Paul, Histoire de l'Empire Mongol, 1993, Fayard, ISBN 2213031649
  • Kenneth Meyer Setton, "A History of the Crusades"
  • Runciman, Steven, History of the Crusades, III, Penguin Books, 2002 edition, ISBN 014013705X
Categories: