Revision as of 20:02, 19 February 2008 view sourceZzuuzz (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators136,853 editsm Reverted edits by Djscubasam (talk) to last version by Elkman← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:08, 19 February 2008 view source 24.187.2.73 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Criteria for failure == | == Criteria for failure == | ||
The criteria for failure are heavily dependent on context of use, and may be ] to a particular ] or ]. A situation considered to be a failure by one might be considered a success by another, particularly in cases of direct ] or a ] ]. As well, the degree of success or failure in a |
The criteria for failure are heavily dependent on context of use, and may be ] to a particular ] or ]. A situation considered to be a failure by one might be considered a success by another, particularly in cases of direct ] or a ] ]. As well, the degree of success or failure in a j; | ||
It may also be difficult or impossible to ascertain whether a situation meets criteria for failure or success due to ambiguous or ill-defined definition of those criteria. Finding useful and effective criteria, or ]s, to judge the success or failure of a situation may itself be a significant task. | |||
== Flavors of failure == | |||
Failure can be differentially perceived from the viewpoints of the evaluators. A person who is only interested in the final outcome of an activity would consider it to be an ''Outcome Failure'' if the core issue has not been resolved or a core need is not met. A failure can also be a ''process failure'' whereby although the activity is completed successfully, a person may still feel dissatisfied if the underlying process is perceived to be below expected standard or benchmark. | |||
#Failure to ] | |||
#Failure to ] | |||
== Commercial failures == | |||
A '''commercial failure''' is a ] that does not reach expectations of success, failing to come even close. A major flop goes one step further and is recognized for its complete lack of success. | |||
Most of the items listed below had high expectations, significant financial investments, and/or widespread publicity, but fell far short of success. Due to the subjective nature of "success" and "meeting expectations", there can be disagreement about what constitutes a "major flop." | |||
*For flops in computer and video gaming, see ] | |||
*For company failures related to the 1997–2001 ], see ] | |||
*See also ] | |||
== Other failures == | |||
*For military disasters, see ] | |||
*For events that were highly anticipated but either did not happen or turned out to be disappointing, see ] | |||
== See also == | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
== References == | |||
<div class="references-small" > | |||
<references/> | |||
* Charles Perrow, ''Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies'', New Tork: Basic Books, 1983. Paperback reprint, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999, ISBN 0-691-00412-9 | |||
* ] ''Born Losers: A History of Failure in America''. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2005. ISBN 0-674-01510-X, ISBN 0-674-02107-X | |||
</div> | |||
== External links == | |||
{{wikiquote}} | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Revision as of 22:08, 19 February 2008
"Fail" and "Phail" redirect here. For Failure, see Fail (disambiguation).Failure (or flop) in general refers to the state or condition of not meeting a desirable or intended objective. It may be viewed as the opposite of success.
Criteria for failure
The criteria for failure are heavily dependent on context of use, and may be relative to a particular observer or belief system. A situation considered to be a failure by one might be considered a success by another, particularly in cases of direct competition or a zero-sum game. As well, the degree of success or failure in a j;