Misplaced Pages

User talk:Anonymous editor: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:21, 18 July 2005 editAxon (talk | contribs)2,062 edits Making RfC for Germen← Previous edit Revision as of 14:48, 21 July 2005 edit undoBrandonYusufToropov (talk | contribs)7,035 edits JihadNext edit →
Line 59: Line 59:


I'm putting together an ] for ]'s behaviour on the ] article and associated pages. Since you have been involved in disputes with this user before I was hoping you might be able to contribute to the draft before I publish it on ]. ] 12:21, 18 July 2005 (UTC) I'm putting together an ] for ]'s behaviour on the ] article and associated pages. Since you have been involved in disputes with this user before I was hoping you might be able to contribute to the draft before I publish it on ]. ] 12:21, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

== ] ==

Can you please take a look at the editor's poll I posted at the Jihad talk page ]? ] 14:37, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:48, 21 July 2005

Feel free to leave me a message below as long as it's legitimate in regard to recent events/issues.

I mostly reply to my messages on the the talk page of the user who left the message, but sometimes you may find copies of my large-scale discussions with users here too.

Old discussions:


Response to:Please don't use sockpuppets

"I have found out that you were trying to make a rebuttal towards bulldozer, but then used Grubb (aka you) to make the edit. I would like you to please consider stopping this nationalist violence on that article and refrain from using sockpuppets. Aside from that I hope to continue a productive dialogue with you and hope that you will retract the comment from the discussion as it is already on Bulldozer's talk page. On that article it serves no purpose but will cause more controversy. Thanks, Anonymous editor July 3, 2005 04:28 (UTC)"

LOL! User:Grubb is the username of my brother. He made that edit w/o signing himself in and it got signed by my name because he was using my laptop. :) IncMan July 3, 2005 04:36 (UTC)

Lol. Ok, I will trust you on this, but I am hoping that he will retract his comment as bulldozer probably already got the idea and that will just cause more controversy. I hope you are both productive editors. Thanks. --Anonymous editor July 3, 2005 04:44 (UTC)
I was shocked when I read that comment left by my bro. He never takes interest in Politics but that comment was just too much. Don't worry, I'll make sure he retracts from his statements. I've already warned him to keep himself out of controversies (User_talk:Grubb). Thanks and cheers IncMan July 3, 2005 05:02 (UTC)
My bro has retracted from his statements. Think that edit got signed again by my name. Thanks IncMan July 3, 2005 05:38 (UTC)

I revised Sahaba

Hope you can take a quick look at it and perhaps help to defend this (hopefully, closer to NPOV) version against revert efforts that may materialize. BrandonYusufToropov 3 July 2005 09:45 (UTC)

Islam and slavery

In response to the protection of the page, Urchid created Islam and Slavery Uncensored, which I've deleted. Unbelievable. File:Meh.gif SlimVirgin July 3, 2005 16:45 (UTC)

Zeno rampant in Muhammad

I've done two reverts and I can't do any more. Zeno has replaced a section on sources with his version touting Ibn Ishaq as the only real source on Muhammad and claiming that it is deprecated by Muslims because ... and then he lists every single accusation against Muhammad that he can find in Ibn Ishaq. It's transparently POV. Zeno and Coolcat are reverting to keep it in place. When you get back from the barbecue, or whatever you and family are doing ... Zora 4 July 2005 08:06 (UTC)


I know you're busy with Muhammad, but ...

Could you please take a look at the ongoing dispute at Sahaba? Many thanks.

Edip

Edip Yuksel has been restored and immediately VfDed, which I think is idiotic, but is their right. I've begun cleanup and NPOV. Take a look at the Talk page for one particularly egregious paragraph that I'm unsure about. --MikeJ9919 5 July 2005 15:33 (UTC)

have a gander?

Wondering if you can have a gander over at two revert wars Jayjg and I are involved in. Al Andalus (Muslim Spain) and The Sword of the Prophet. You can check the talk pages to see his rationale for the constant reverting, because I don't understand why he's doing it, but, help is appreciated! regards - --Irishpunktom\ 19:34, July 10, 2005 (UTC)

Can you please ...

... take a look at my work here, and perhaps add it to your watchlist? Many thanks, BrandonYusufToropov 13:05, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Update. User:Carbonite instantly reverted. BrandonYusufToropov 13:20, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Making RfC for Germen

I'm putting together an RfC for Germen's behaviour on the Islamophobia article and associated pages. Since you have been involved in disputes with this user before I was hoping you might be able to contribute to the draft before I publish it on WP:RFC. Axon 12:21, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

Jihad

Can you please take a look at the editor's poll I posted at the Jihad talk page here? BrandonYusufToropov 14:37, 21 July 2005 (UTC)