| Revision as of 17:17, 22 July 2005 editProtohiro (talk | contribs)212 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:24, 22 July 2005 edit undoMBisanz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users126,668 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| No, I think this deserves its own article. And I have to question the wording, she was not the victim of statutory rape, but of rape. Polanski was convicted of statutory but that does not reflect the facts of the case. ] 17:17, 22 July 2005 (UTC) | No, I think this deserves its own article. And I have to question the wording, she was not the victim of statutory rape, but of rape. Polanski was convicted of statutory but that does not reflect the facts of the case. ] 17:17, 22 July 2005 (UTC) | ||
| I'd agree that it should be expanded into its own article. ] 17:24, 22 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:24, 22 July 2005
I've done a partial merge. Anyone think more should be moved? --ssd 04:15, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
No, I think this deserves its own article. And I have to question the wording, she was not the victim of statutory rape, but of rape. Polanski was convicted of statutory but that does not reflect the facts of the case. protohiro 17:17, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
I'd agree that it should be expanded into its own article. Mbisanz 17:24, 22 July 2005 (UTC)