Misplaced Pages

:Featured article candidates/Soprano Home Movies: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:49, 26 February 2008 editL.A.Nutti (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers9,279 edits Created page with '===]=== <noinclude>: [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page={{subst:SUBPAGENAMEE}}#view=0 Check external links...'  Revision as of 10:54, 26 February 2008 edit undoL.A.Nutti (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers9,279 editsm rewrote a littleNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
<noinclude>: </noinclude> <noinclude>: </noinclude>


'''Self-nomination'''<br>Hey, I've listed this article about one of my favorite ''The Sopranos'' epsiodes as a Featured Article Candidate because I think it qualifies. I modeled it after the ] and ] articles. Although not as long and comprehensive as the latter, (because there simply is more information about ''Lost'' than ''The Sopranos'') I think it covers all important aspects and follows ] closely. The plot summary is a little longer than what's recommended but I really can't shorten it anymore without losing coherency, and as stated, "do not directly limit summaries if doing so makes them incoherent - the majority of good and featured episode articles overrun this limit slightly." I know that the ] part is just one long sentence but I really think it looks OK like that. &ndash;] <sup>]</sup> 10:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Self-nomination
Hey, I've listed this article about one of my favorite ''The Sopranos'' epsiodes as a Featured Article Candidate
because I think it qualifies. I modeled it after ] and ]. Although not as long and comprehensive as the latter, (because there simply is more information about Lost than The Sopranos on the internet) I think it covers all important aspects and follows ] closely. The plot summary is a little longer than what's recommended but I really can't shorten it anymore without losing coherency, and as stated, "do not directly limit summaries if doing so makes them incoherent - the majority of good and featured episode articles overrun this limit slightly." I know that the ] part is just one long sentence but I really think it looks OK like that. &ndash;] <sup>]</sup> 10:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:54, 26 February 2008

Soprano Home Movies

Check external links

Self-nomination
Hey, I've listed this article about one of my favorite The Sopranos epsiodes as a Featured Article Candidate because I think it qualifies. I modeled it after the Pilot (House) and Through the Looking Glass (Lost) articles. Although not as long and comprehensive as the latter, (because there simply is more information about Lost than The Sopranos) I think it covers all important aspects and follows Misplaced Pages:Television episodes closely. The plot summary is a little longer than what's recommended but I really can't shorten it anymore without losing coherency, and as stated, "do not directly limit summaries if doing so makes them incoherent - the majority of good and featured episode articles overrun this limit slightly." I know that the ratings part is just one long sentence but I really think it looks OK like that. –FunkyVoltron 10:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)