Misplaced Pages

:Featured article candidates/Soprano Home Movies: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:49, 26 February 2008 editThedemonhog (talk | contribs)12,045 edits →Soprano Home Movies: Okay← Previous edit Revision as of 16:22, 26 February 2008 edit undoL.A.Nutti (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers9,279 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
:] closed after three days. ] (]) 15:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC) :] closed after three days. ] (]) 15:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
::So…? –''']''' <small>''] • ]''</small> 15:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC) ::So…? –''']''' <small>''] • ]''</small> 15:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
:::Yeah, , ] helped me with copy-editing, which was the main thing, and I also did the automated review and made some changes accordingly.&ndash;] <sup>]</sup> 16:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:22, 26 February 2008

Soprano Home Movies

Check external links

Self-nomination
Hey, I've listed this article about one of my favorite The Sopranos epsiodes as a Featured Article Candidate because I think it qualifies. I modeled it after the Pilot (House) and Through the Looking Glass (Lost) articles. Although not as long and comprehensive as the latter, (because there simply is more information about Lost than The Sopranos) I think it covers all important aspects and follows Misplaced Pages:Television episodes closely. The article looked like this before I started working on it. The plot summary is a little longer than what's recommended but I really can't shorten it anymore without losing coherency, and as stated, "do not directly limit summaries if doing so makes them incoherent - the majority of good and featured episode articles overrun this limit slightly." I know that the ratings part is just one long sentence but I really think it looks OK like that. –FunkyVoltron 10:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Peer review closed after three days. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
So…? –thedemonhog talk • edits 15:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, , Opark 77 helped me with copy-editing, which was the main thing, and I also did the automated review and made some changes accordingly.–FunkyVoltron 16:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)