Revision as of 05:50, 27 February 2008 editHistorian info (talk | contribs)332 edits →Good work- well done← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:52, 27 February 2008 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,297 editsm Signing comment by Historian info - "→Good work- well done: "Next edit → | ||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
*4. It is an article about an ethnic group so it will always be under threat from racist anons (who do not have wiki accounts) | *4. It is an article about an ethnic group so it will always be under threat from racist anons (who do not have wiki accounts) | ||
In short getting semi-protection for the article would stop vast majority (99%) of the vandal attacks. Finally, it would reduce the workload long-term for wikipedians who are trying to protect the article, like you & me. | In short getting semi-protection for the article would stop vast majority (99%) of the vandal attacks. Finally, it would reduce the workload long-term for wikipedians who are trying to protect the article, like you & me. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
==Coaching page== | ==Coaching page== |
Revision as of 05:52, 27 February 2008
February 2008Welcome. King Lopez 11:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC) ThanksThanks for helping with my userbox--MJ Digs (talk) 08:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
RFA thanks.: RFA thanks :.
Admin coachingI added a few more questions to your coaching page. Useight (talk) 22:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Your PastThose blocks were just over 1 year ago. Many editors feel that you have to be 6 months block-free, so you have that. However, there were two blocks in short succession, which could make the average !voter go from 6 months to 1 year. But, they were a year ago and you only had the account for a month at the time. I think you'll be fine. Useight (talk) 04:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Happy Birthday
--Nadir D Steinmetz 11:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Good work- well doneHi King Lopez pleased to meet you, well done for reverting vandalism on the Jat people article. I thank you. The reason why there are so many vandals on the Jat people article is because its about a ethnic group and so it attracts alot racist vandalizers. Please can you put it in your watch list we need all the help we can get. A good idea is maybe tell 3-4 other experienced wikipedians to keep an eye on it in their watchlists so we can all keep eye on it and prevent vanadalism. The main things to watch out for in vandalism attempts are 1. Page blankings 2. Removal or references 3. Hate racist or negative comments about this ethnic group and other general hate negative statements. Please can you put it in your watch list we need all the help we can get. A good idea is tell 3-4 other experienced wikipedians to keep it in their watchlist and watch and check for 1. Page blankings 2. Removal or references 3. Hate racist or negative comments about this ethnic group and other general hate negative statements. I hope you can help - we need to reduce ethnic hate in the world so please protect the article. best regards. --Historian info (talk) 15:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
I think your suggestion of getting semi-protection on the article is an excellent way to protect it from racism. The reason why semi protection is an excellent idea for Jat people article is because of the following:
In short getting semi-protection for the article would stop vast majority (99%) of the vandal attacks. Finally, it would reduce the workload long-term for wikipedians who are trying to protect the article, like you & me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Historian info (talk • contribs) 05:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC) Coaching pageYes, it's looking real nice now. It's the first one I've seen that had some actual formatting instead of just text. Useight (talk) 18:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC) |