Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:28, 27 February 2008

This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (August 2006)

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Dyatlov Pass incident" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

This article may require cleanup to meet Misplaced Pages's quality standards. No cleanup reason has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (February 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

This article's factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The Dyatlov Pass Accident refers to a mysterious event that resulted in the death of nine ski hikers in the northern Ural mountains. The accident happened on the night of February 2 1959 on the east shoulder of the mountain Kholat Syakhl (Холат Сяхл) (the Mansi name, meaning Mountain of the Dead). The mountain pass (N61°45'17", E59°27'46") where the accident happened had been named after the group's leader, Igor Dyatlov (Игорь Дятлов) - the Dyatlov pass (Перевал Дятлова).

The causes of the accident are still unknown. Neither the official inquest, nor attempts by unofficial enthusiastic investigations, have solved the mystery.

History

A group was formed for the ski-march across the northern Urals in Sverdlovsk (Свердловск), now Ekaterinburg (Екатеринбург). The group, led by Igor Dyatlov, consisted of eight men and two women. Most were students and graduates of Ural Polytechnical Institute (Уральский Политехнический Институт, УПИ), now Ural State Technical University (Уральский Государственный Технический Университет, УГТУ-УПИ):

• Igor Dyatlov (Игорь Дятлов), the group's leader
• Zinaida Kolmogorova (Зинаида Колмогорова)
• Lyudmila Dubinina (Людмила Дубинина)
• Alexander Kolevatov (Александр Колеватов)
• Rustem Slobodin (Рустем Слободин)
• Georgyi Krivonischenko (Георгий Кривонищенко)
• Yuri Doroshenko (Юрий Дорошенко)
• Nikolai Tibo-Brinyol (Николай Тибо-Бриньоль)
• Alexander Zolotarev (Александр Золотарев)
• Yuri Yudin (Юрий Юдин)

The goal of the expedition was to reach Otorten (Отортен), a mountain 10 kilometers north of the place of the accident. This route, at that season, was estimated as "Category III", the most difficult. All members were experienced in long ski marches and mountain expeditions; for many, including Dyatlov, the march was an opportunity to get a higher degree in sports.

The group arrived by train at Ivdel (Ивдель), a city at the center of the northern province of Sverdlovsk Oblast on January 25. They then took a truck to Vizhai (Вижай) - the last inhabited settlement so far up north. They started their march towards Otorten from Vizhai on January 27. The next day, one of the members (Yuri Yudin) was forced to go back because of health problems. The group now consisted of nine people.

Thanks to diaries and cameras which had been found around their last camp, it is possible to track the group's route down to the day preceding the accident. On January 31, the group arrived at the edge of a highland area and began to prepare for climbing. In a woody valley they built a storage for surplus food and equipment which would be used for the trip back. The following day (February 1), the hikers started to move through the Pass. It seems they planned to get over the pass and make camp for the next night on the opposite side, but because of worsening weather conditions, snowstorms and decreasing visibility, they lost their direction and deviated west, upward to the top of Kholat Syakhl. When they realised their mistake, the group decided to stop moving and arranged camp at their current position on the slope of the mountain.

The Search

It was agreed beforehand that Dyatlov would send a telegraph to their sports club as soon as the group returned to Vizhai. It was agreed to do so no later than February 12, but when this date had past and no messages had been received, there was no reaction - delays of a few days were common in such expeditions. Only after the relatives of the travellers demanded a rescue operation did the head of the institute send the first rescue groups, consisting of volunteer students and teachers, on (February 20). Later, the army and police forces became involved, with planes and helicopters being ordered to join the rescue operation.

On February 26, the searchers finally found the abandoned camp on Kholat Syakhl. It was obvious that the camp had been left hastily - the tent had been ripped from within, as if the inhabitants had left so quickly that they had no time to open the tent normally. A chain of footsteps could be followed, leading down to the edge of nearby woods (on the opposite side of the pass, 1.5km north-east), but after 500 meters they were covered with snow. At the forest edge, under a large old pine, the searchers found remains of a fire, along with the first two dead bodies, those of Krivonischenko and Doroshenko, shoeless and dressed only in their underwear. Between the pine and the camp the searchers found three more corpses - Dyatlov, Kolmogorova and Slobodin - who seemed to have died in poses suggesting that they were attempting to return to the camp. They were found separately at distances of 300, 480 and 630 meters from the pine tree.

Searching for the remaining four travelers took more than two months. They were finally found on May 4, under four meters of snow, in a stream valley further into the wood from the pine tree.

Investigation

A legal inquest had been started immediately after finding the first five bodies. A medical examination found no injuries which might have led to their deaths, and it was concluded that they had all died of hypothermia. One person had a small crack in his skull, but it was not thought to be a fatal wound.

An examination of the four bodies which were found in May changed the picture. Three of them had fatal injuries; the body of Tibo-Brinyol had major skull damage, and both Dubunina and Zolotarev had major chest fractures. The force required to cause such damage would have been extremely high, with one expert comparing it to the force of a car crash. Notably, the bodies had no external wounds, as if they were crippled by a high level of pressure.

There was evidence that the team were forced to leave the camp during the night, as they were sleeping. Though the temperature was very low (around -25° to -30°C) with a storm blowing, all dead were dressed only partially, and certainly inadequately for the conditions. Some of them had only one shoe, while others had no shoes or wore only socks. Some were found wrapped in snips of ripped clothes which seemed to be cut from those who were already dead.

The available parts of the inquest files include the following facts:

• Six of the group members died of hypothermia and three of fatal injuries.
• There were no indications of other people nearby apart from the nine travellers on Kholat Syakhl, nor anyone in the surrounding areas.
• The tent had been ripped from within.
• The victims had died 6 to 8 hours after their last meal.
• Traces from the camp showed that all group members (including those who were found injured) left the camp of their own accord, by foot. This implies that those with injuries were injured after they left the camp.
• The fatal injuries of the three bodies could not have been caused by another human being.
• Forensic radiation tests had shown high doses of radioactive contamination on the clothes of a few victims. These test results were not taken into account for the final verdict.

Official suggestions on the events which forced the team to awake suddenly, leave the camp undressed and run into the winter night towards their deaths are unknown.

The final verdict was that the group members all died because of an "unknown compelling force". The inquest ceased officially in May 1959 due to the absence of a guilty party. The files were sent to a secret archive, and the photocopies of the case became available only in the 1990s, with some parts missing - the content of these parts is a matter of controversy.

Facts ignored by official inquest

Some researchers point out the following facts which were missed, perhaps ignored, by officials:

• After the funerals, relatives of the deceased claimed that the skin of the victims had a strange orange tan, and that the dead were completely grey-haired.

• A former investigating officer said, in a private interview, that his dosimeter had shown a high radiation level on Kholat Syakhl, and that this was the reason for the radiation found on the bodies. However, the source of the contamination was not found.

• Another group of hikers (about 50 kilometers south of the accident) reported that they saw strange orange spheres in the night sky to the north (likely the direction of in Kholat Syakhl) at the same date as the accident happened. Similar "spheres" were observed in Ivdel and adjacent areas continually in the period February to March 1959, by various independent witnesses (including the meteorology service and the military). The search team reported that they had observed the same spheres above Kholat Syakhl on March 31.

• Some reconstructions of the victims' behavior suggest that they were blinded. The rescue team had seen that the victims broke damp and thick pine branches for the fire, even though there was good dry brushwood around.

• Some objects found near the camp were not identified as properties of any of the group members.

• One victim, Dubunina, had no tongue.

Aftermath

The death of Dyatlov's group caused significant public concern in Sverdlovsk city. To mitigate the situation and stop the rumors, regional officials (Sverdlovsk regional Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union) was forced to make a public announcement claiming that all group members died of hypothermia, due to their own mistakes and poor organization of the march by the sports club. The head of the sports club was discharged and several staff members from the institute were severely reprimanded.

Neither the fatal injures of the three members, nor any other details of the incident, had been disclosed. All searchers were warned that they were to keep the details of their work private, and were not to tell anyone else. Though there was no evidence of direct KGB involvement, the secrecy of the events led many to believe that the case was under their supervision.

The region north of Ivdel was closed for tourists over the following two years. Only after this time could friends of the dead visit the Pass to mount a memorial plaque.

In 1967, Sverdlovsk writer and journalist Yuri Yarovoi (Юрий Яровой) published the fiction novel "Of the highest rank of complexity" ("Высшей категории трудности") which was highly inspired by this incident. Yarovoi was known to be involved into the search of Dyatlov's group and inquest, and so had insight into the events, including acting as an official photographer for the search campaign and of the investigation on its early stage. However, the book was written in the Soviet era when the details of the accident were kept a secret, and so Yarovoi avoided uncovering anything beyond the official position and well-known facts. The book romanticized the accident and had a much more optimistic end than the real events - only the group leader was found deceased. Yarovoi's colleagues say that he had two alternative versions of the novel, but both were declined by censorship. Unfortunately, since Yarovoi's death in 1980, all his archives including photos, diaries and manuscripts have been lost.

Some details of the tragedy became publicly available in 1990 due to the publications and discussions in Sverdlovsk's regional press. One of the first authors was Sverdlovsk journalist Anatoly Guschin (Анатолий Гущин). Guschin reported that the police officials gave him special permission to study the original files of the inquest and use these materials in his publications. He noticed, however, that a number of pages were excluded from the files, as well as the mysterious "envelope" mentioned in the case materials list. At the same time, unofficial photocopies of the case parts started to circulate among other enthusiastic researchers.

Guschin summarized his studies in the book entitled "The price of state secrets is nine lives" ("Цена гостайны - девять жизней"). Some researchers criticized it due to its concentration on the speculative theory of a "Soviet secret weapon", but the publication aroused the public interest in the theory, stimulated by post-soviet openness and freedom from fear of the KGB. Indeed, many of those who remained silent for 40 years reported new facts about that accident. One of them was the former police officer Lev Ivanov (Лев Иванов), who led the official inquest in 1959. In 1990 he published an article along with his admission that the investigation team had no rational explanation of the accident. He also reported that he received direct orders from high-ranking regional officials to dismiss the inquest and keep its materials secret after reporting that the team had seen "flying spheres". Ivanov personally believes in a paranormal explanation - specifically, UFOs.

In 2000, a regional TV company produced the documentary film "Dyatlov Pass" ("Перевал Дятлова"). With the help of the film crew, an Ekaterinburg writer, Anna Matveyeva (Анна Матвеева), published the fiction/documentary novella of the same name. A large part of the book includes broad quotations from the official case, diaries of victims, interviews with searchers and other documentaries previously used for the film. The book details the everyday life and thoughts of a woman (an alter ego of the author herself) who attempts to resolve the case.

The Dyatlov Foundation has been founded in Ekaterinburg city, with the help of Ural State Technical University, led by Yuri Kuntsevitch (Юрий Кунцевич), a close friend of Igor Dyatlov and a member of the search team. The foundation's aim is to convince modern Russian officials to reopen the investigation of the case, and solve it. Its other purpose is the upkeep of "the Dyatlov museum", to honour the memory of the dead hikers.

Explanations

There is no consensus on explanations of this accident. Different researchers, including historians, journalists, former members of the search campaign and others, advocate different versions and points of view. All suggested variants of explanation have their own flaws and thus, debatable.

The Paranormal

Reported UFO activity in the region along with radioactivity and strange tan on skin of the victims has led some people to think that contact with a UFO caused their deaths. This version is advocated and has been popularized, particularly, by Vadim Chernobrov (known UFO investigation enthusiast) and his Kosmopoisk organization. Lev Ivanov, former police officer and official investigator in 1959 is also a supporter of this version. As all paranormal phenomena kept in silence in USSR (official ideology ignored them as being incompatible with the materialistic science), the advocates of UFO-version consider official secrecy of "the Dyatlov's case" as another proof for their beliefs.

Some try to explain the disaster via the local myths and legends of Mansi, the indigenous people of that area. Indeed, the surrounding is full of strange stories and even the local toponymics seems mystical. Otorten, the goal of expedition, translates from the Mansi language to "Do Not Go There". Kholat Syakhl, the place of disaster, translates in the same language to "The Mountain of Dead". There is an old Mansi-legend, that Kholat Syakhl had been named so after nine Mansi men died on top of the mountain seeking salvation from the Flood in ancient times. This territory is acknowledged by local Mansi as "damned". They avoid visiting it when they go hunting or when they follow their deer herds. Though, it is known that there are not any explicit taboo visiting this place (against the version that the travelers were punished by local people for pervasion into a sacral zone).

The fantastic explanations inspired by Mansi legends tell about magical evil spirit which had been evoked by travelers. Another think that a Yeti caused the accident.

Murder

All explanations that the group had been attacked by other human beings face strong counter-evidence - there are no traces of any other people. There are only a couple of questionable things here; the empty sheath of a knife and a piece of cloth like that of a soldiers greatcoat, found near the tent and near the bodies in the stream valley. Yuri Yudin, who "survived" the accident (the one who had left the team at the start, out of bad health) had identified the owner of every other object and piece of clothing found around there, but not of those two.

There are several arguments about who the murderers may be:

• Mansi shamans, who killed the hikers because of taboo violation, or for another ritual purpose. It seems to be completely wrong though it initially was the first surmise tested by the official inquest. As it was already said, despite of the dark legends neither Otorten nor Kholat Syakhl were sacred or tabooed places. The peaceful Mansi people are very friendly towards Russians and many of them helped to find the group (they are excellent hunters and pathfinders). And their beliefs are not related with ritual murders by any means (though they preserve some traditional ceremonies and cults, they are Christians).

• Escaped prisoners. IvdelLag in the northern Urals, was a large part of the soviet Gulag-system. Although Gulag population had been reduced more than twice as a result of Khruschev's political amnesty campaigns ("the Thaw"), the numerous labour camps still functioned in Ivdel region, mainly because of its vast forest resources. The nearest camp was in Vizhai, from where the group started its march. This version, however, seems to be quite wrong too - no one will run away from the prison towards uninhabited land in sub-polar winter and without the basic equipment (skis). The skis of victims were untouched, as well as their food, money and the bottle of alcohol.

• The security guard of a secret experiment. There is a version that the hikers accidentally entered a zone where testing of secret weapons was happening, when the security forces of that zone found and killed the hikers.

• Wild animals seems to be quite improbable. Not one of them would have run 1,5 kilometers, out in the middle of the night in their underwear, because of an animal. Dyatlov's friends remembered that in another expedition he faced a bear, which they successfully chased away.

Soviet secret weapon

Another popular version is that the group had entered the range of experiments with a secret weapon or by chance got in an unscheduled accident with new weapon or spacecraft. Advocates of this version point to the known facts: strange light effects in the night sky, radioactive contamination, orange skin colour (which might come as a result of rocket fuel intoxication) and a level of secrecy around the accident. A few years ago, researchers found a ring of metal nearby. It looks like a rocket component, but some experts believe it does not date back to 1959.

Suspicion of military interests in that area has also been provoked by building a secret object nearby. It was, supposedly, a radar station, erected few years after the accident and in existence until the late 1980's. It could be a part of regional anti-aircraft defense system, massively reinforced after Gary Powers flight in 1960.

It is also suspicious that the military searchers inexplicably and flatly refused to evacuate the dead bodies in their helicopters. This fact is known from radiograms sent by a head of the rescue operation with angry complaints about the behavior of the military. The bodies were finally evacuated by a civilian helicopter. The reasons why the army pilots refused to carry the corpses even packed into impermeable bags are unknown and look strange. The supporters of the weapon theory think the pilots knew, or at least suspected, the causes of the disaster and of radioactivity.

The opponents of this theory note that there were no traces of explosions or fire near Kholat Syakhl. There were also no records of Soviet rocket launchings at that time. Moreover, there were no launching sites from which a rocket could reach the northern Urals (Plesetsk spaceport was ready to launch the rockets only at the end of 1959). It is also doubtful that the weapon experiments had been planned in a public place, instead of a special safe ground (like Semipalatinsk) complete with all infrastructure necessary for observing and registering the effects of the weapon.

Natural disasters

The experienced climbers suggested an avalanche as an explanation of the accident with the Dyatlov's group. They criticize Dyatlov for picking a dangerous place for the last camp. They say that the slope of the mountainside where the tent had been raised was steep enough to be in danger of an avalanche. By this version, snow on the slope above the camp was affected by the mounting of the camp. In a few hours it had slid down and closed the entrance to the tent. This explains why the people inside were forced to rip the tent to exit. The snow may have also had the power to cripple the bodies, but the rescuers mentioned nothing about traces of an avalanche near the camp. Moreover, it is unlikely that after the avalanche, three heavily crippled persons were able to travel 1,5 kilometers to their deaths.

It was suggested also that the relief configuration and the winds might cause an infrasound effect which led the people to panic. Running down the mountain slope, some of them fell over the rocks and got damaged.

References

1. Svetlana Osadchuk (February 19, 2008). "Mysterious Deaths of 9 Skiers Still Unresolved". St. Petersburg Times. Retrieved 2008-02-28. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
2. Яровой Юрий: "Высшей категории трудности", Средне-Уральское Кн.Изд-во, Свердловск, 1967 (Yarovoi, Yuri: "Of the highest rank of complexity", Sredneuralskoye knizhnoye izdatelstvo, Sverdlovsk, 1967)
3. Гущин Анатолий: "Цена гостайны - девять жизней", изд-во "Уральский рабочий", Свердловск, 1990 (Gushchin Anatoly: "The price of state secrets is nine lives", Izdatelstvo "Uralskyi Rabochyi", Sverdlovsk, 1990)
4. Иванов Лев: "Тайна огненных шаров", "Ленинский путь", Кустанай, 22-24 ноября 1990 г. (Ivanov, Lev: "Enigma of the fire balls", "Leninskyi Put'", Kustanai, Nov 22-24 1990)
5. Матвеева Анна: "Перевал Дятлова", "Урал" N12-2000, Екатеринбург (Matveyeva Anna: "Dyatlov pass", "Ural"#12-2000, Ekaterinburg)

Films

• Dyatlov pass (Перевал Дятлова): 2000, TAU (Ural Television Agency) (ТАУ - Телевизионное Агентство Урала, 2000г.)

External links

• (In Russian.)
• The photo gallery
• The photo gallery (includes photos from cameras of victims, photos taken by searchers and others)
• Online version of the novella by Anna Matveieva (in Russian)
• Some photos and text (in Russian)
• "The Deadly Case of 9 Fleeing Skiers", Moscow News, Feb 02, 2008 (in English)

• Orphaned articles from August 2006
• Articles needing cleanup from February 2008
• Cleanup tagged articles without a reason field from February 2008
• Misplaced Pages pages needing cleanup from February 2008
• Disasters in Russia
• Mysteries
• 1959