Misplaced Pages

Bismarck-class battleship: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:58, 24 July 2005 edit213.122.214.27 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 19:00, 24 July 2005 edit undo213.122.214.27 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The German battleships Bismarck and Tirpitz were a single class of extremely powerful capital ships intended by Admiral Erich Raeder (commander in chief of the German Navy during the 1930s until 1943, when he was replaced by Karl Donitz) to constitute a major part of the battleship component of Germany's failed "Plan Z," which hoped to create a surface fleet able to compete against the British Royal Navy for supremacy over the world's oceans, or at least over the Atlantic and possibly -- with the help of the Italians, who were also in the midst of a battleship-building program -- the Mediterrannean. The German battleships Bismarck and Tirpitz were a single class of extremely powerful capital ships intended by Admiral Erich Raeder (commander in chief of the German Navy during the 1930s until 1943, when he was replaced by Karl Donitz) to constitute a major part of the battleship component of Germany's failed "Plan Z," which hoped to create a surface fleet able to compete against the British Royal Navy for supremacy over the world's oceans, or at least over the Atlantic and possibly -- with the help of the Italians, who were also in the midst of a battleship-building program -- the Mediterrannean.


Bismarck and Tirpitz were laid down in 1936 and launched three years later, nominally 35,000 tonnes each in accordance with the 1923 Washington Treaty, but in reality weighing in at a considerably heftier 43,0000 tonnes. Although Bismarck and Tirpitz were nearly identical insofar as basic configuration and dimensions, Bismarck has become something of a naval legend in service while Tirpitz led a comparatively unglamorous life. A rough maritime comparison might be made between the White Star Line's sister liners Titanic and Olympic, the former, like the Bismarck, going down on its maiden voyage and into popular mythology, while the latter, like the Tirpitz, served much longer but with far less excitement. Originally, a third battleship in the Bismark class was planned, but it was decided in 1940 -- when it was already partially completed -- that it should be an aircraft carrier instead, and a costly and time-consuming conversion took place. Messerchmitt Bf-109E fighter aircraft and Junkers Ju-87B dive bombers were given slight modifications (strenghtened landing gear and arrester hooks, among other slight additions) to serve on this new German aircraft carrier, but pressing war needs and changing priorities caused the German military to abandon this new vessel when it was over two thirds complete. Its redundant hull was broken up later in the war and the material used for other military needs. Bismarck and Tirpitz were laid down in 1936 and launched three years later, nominally 35,000 tonnes each in accordance with the 1923 Washington Treaty, but in reality weighing in at a considerably heftier 43,000 tonnes. Although Bismarck and Tirpitz were nearly identical insofar as basic configuration and dimensions, Bismarck has become something of a naval legend in service while Tirpitz led a comparatively unglamorous life. A rough maritime comparison might be made between the White Star Line's sister liners Titanic and Olympic, the former, like the Bismarck, going down on its maiden voyage and into popular mythology, while the latter, like the Tirpitz, served much longer but with far less excitement. Originally, a third battleship in the Bismark class was planned, but it was decided in 1940 -- when it was already partially completed -- that it should be an aircraft carrier instead, and a costly and time-consuming conversion took place. Messerchmitt Bf-109E fighter aircraft and Junkers Ju-87B dive bombers were given slight modifications (strenghtened landing gear and arrester hooks, among other slight additions) to serve on this new German aircraft carrier, but pressing war needs and changing priorities caused the German military to abandon this new vessel when it was over two thirds complete. Its redundant hull was broken up later in the war and the material used for other military needs.





Revision as of 19:00, 24 July 2005

The German battleships Bismarck and Tirpitz were a single class of extremely powerful capital ships intended by Admiral Erich Raeder (commander in chief of the German Navy during the 1930s until 1943, when he was replaced by Karl Donitz) to constitute a major part of the battleship component of Germany's failed "Plan Z," which hoped to create a surface fleet able to compete against the British Royal Navy for supremacy over the world's oceans, or at least over the Atlantic and possibly -- with the help of the Italians, who were also in the midst of a battleship-building program -- the Mediterrannean.

Bismarck and Tirpitz were laid down in 1936 and launched three years later, nominally 35,000 tonnes each in accordance with the 1923 Washington Treaty, but in reality weighing in at a considerably heftier 43,000 tonnes. Although Bismarck and Tirpitz were nearly identical insofar as basic configuration and dimensions, Bismarck has become something of a naval legend in service while Tirpitz led a comparatively unglamorous life. A rough maritime comparison might be made between the White Star Line's sister liners Titanic and Olympic, the former, like the Bismarck, going down on its maiden voyage and into popular mythology, while the latter, like the Tirpitz, served much longer but with far less excitement. Originally, a third battleship in the Bismark class was planned, but it was decided in 1940 -- when it was already partially completed -- that it should be an aircraft carrier instead, and a costly and time-consuming conversion took place. Messerchmitt Bf-109E fighter aircraft and Junkers Ju-87B dive bombers were given slight modifications (strenghtened landing gear and arrester hooks, among other slight additions) to serve on this new German aircraft carrier, but pressing war needs and changing priorities caused the German military to abandon this new vessel when it was over two thirds complete. Its redundant hull was broken up later in the war and the material used for other military needs.


  • Note* To simplify the text, the Bismarck Class of battleship (two vessels) will simply be called "Bismarck" henceforth.

Bismarck embodied much of what made Germany's World War 1 battleships outstanding combat vessels, however it also represented a twenty year gap between German naval technology and advances made in other navies, most notably in the provision of anti-aircraft armament and the location of fire-control systems. Close inspection of the design reveals it to be little more than an enlarged progression of such WWI vessels as SMS Seydlitz.

Excellent qualities of the Bismark included, naturally, the superb Krupp steel that provided its side belt armor (nearly thirteen inches thick amidships), outstanding centralized fire control systems, almost impregnable turret protection, traditionally excellent flash protection for her magazines, great range and an impressive top speed (over thirty knots, which is comparable to the performance of vessels in the U.S. Navy's "fast battleship" program of a few years later, although at that time battleships were already displaced by aircraft carriers as the principal offensive power in the major navies).

Despite her excellent qualities, Bismarck was not without her flaws. The main fire control system, superb though it was, was located above the main armor deck of the vessel and thus subject to direct or plunging fire. Most British and American capital ships mounted their main fire control systems underneath the main armor deck. The advantage of the German system was that it was mounted highter and advantage could be taken of their superior optical targetting equipment. The disadvantage was that it could be damaged more easily (in fact, the Bismarck's main fire control system was purportedly destroyed by an 8 inch shell hit from the HMS Prince of Wales). Another disadvantage of the German system is that it relied heavily on optical excellence to compensate for crude radar technology. The British capital ships, though lacking the Zeiss lenses that characterized German range finding equipment, were equipped with better radar and thus better equipped to engage enemy vessels in less than optimal conditions (i.e., night, bad weather, in the smoke and din of battle).

The Bismarck had excellent armor, however its basic layout was questionable in light of lessons learned after the First World War. That conflict had all but destroyed the traditional battlecruiser concept (huge, heavily armed but lightly armored, fast ships intended to be the "eyes of the fleet"), thanks mostly to the heavy beating Admiral Beatty's battlecruiser squadron took from the German fleet at Jutland in 1916. Plunging shellfire had caused the sinking of three prize battlecruisers in a short engagement. Thereafter, British battlecruisers were either used more cautiously or modified to improve available deck armour. The German battlecruisers that caused the destruction of Beatty's ships were better-armored, but would have also been vulnerable if struck by plunging fire. Their survival can be traced not only to excellent handling by their commanders but also by the superior flash protection in their turrets, coupled with the superior initial accuracy of the German gunners compared to their British adversaries. The difference afterward between the two fleets was that the British changed their doctrine where as the Germans, for the most part, did not.

The Bismarck, therefore, had relatively thin deck armor and its main armor deck was mounted below some very important areas, such as the fire control system, radio rooms, officers departments, etc. Although it protected the engines and magazines (which is one of the reasons why the ship was well nye unsinkable despite being turned into a floating hulk, until the crew scuttled her), many of the areas necessary to keep the batteries in operation were eventually destroyed by overwhelming Royal Navy firepower. The Bismarck's rudder has also been criticized as being too small in mass to effectively turn the ship quickly, and is seen by some as being in a too-vulnerable configuration. These latter criticisms are often considered as being based solely on the freak torpedo hit (a "one in a million" shot) scored on the Bismarck's rudder by Fairey Swordfist torpedo bombers during the British pursuit of the vessel. Many naval authorities hold that a similar torpedo hit scored on a comparable vessel in any other navy would also be catastrophic.

Lastly, the armament of the Bismarck, while devastating, is sometimes criticized as being less devastating than it ought to be for a ship of its size. Consider that the USS Missouri (a member of the four ship "Iowa" class of the 1941 "fast battlship" program) had approximately the same displacement (45,000 tonnes) but had more and heaver guns (nine sixteen inch cannon in three turrets, versus eight fifteen inch cannon in four turrets for Bismarck). To be fair, the Missouri represented a later technology than the Bismarck, and despite this, it has been predicted that the Missouri would have gone down had she suffered similar damage to the Bismarck, where as Bismarck only went down when her crew scuttled her). To be fair, the Bismarck was never intended to be a "line of battle" ship as British capital ships were designed. A battle line is a naval squadron (at least four heavy ships, often more) of similarly capable ships that act in concert to engage a similar squadron of an opposing navy in an extended gun duel. Line of battle fleets involving modern dreadnough-style ships rarely occurred, however, to the displeasure of those who had invested billions in equipping themselves with expensive capital ships. The Bismarck was instead intended to use its main guns to attack enemy commerce vessels at long range, using its speed to elude any escorting ships. Indeed, Bismarck's top speed was greater than any opposing British capital ship, including the new King George V class. Germany, always in an inferior naval position compared to Britain, could never meet the Royal fleet in a traditional, Trafalgar-like battle, therefore until Raeder's "Plan Z" could be completed (and thus a navy that could fight the British on equal terms), the existing battleships, including Bismarck and Tirpitz, would be used for these hit and run raids. The Bismarck, therefore, and its somewhat obsolete design, were intended merely as an interim ship class that would eventually be supplemented in the German main battle line by larger and even more capable designs. Raeder had in mind ships in the 60,000 tonne category, armed with a dozen sixteen inch guns, but of course the outbreak of war and the subsequent tertiary status given the navy compared to the Wehrmacht and Luftwaffe prevented any of these grandiose schemes from coming to pass.

The secondary armament of the Bismarck is also criticized as being in some ways "overkill" and inadequate. While comparable Royal Navy ships typically had three classes of artillery: heavy (twelve inch cannon and heavier) main battery weapons intended to engage opposing battleships, intermediate (five to eight inch cannon) secondary battery weapons intended to provide defense against fast cruisers and destroyers, and light weapons, which included heavy anti-aircraft flak batteries and machine guns dispersed throughout the ship, German ships tended to have more guns than necessary to do an adequate job.

For example, Royal Navy ships often removed the dedicated, anti-ship secondary batteries altogether since the problem of rushing cruisers and destroyers never came up. Instead, they were equipped with more anti-aircraft flak cannon that could, when necessary, also have an anti-ship role if roving cruisers and destroyers ever did become a problem in a heated battle. Therefore, Royal Navy vessels had heavy cannon for engaging heavy vessels, secondary cannon for engaging lighter vessels and aircraft, and light weapons useful mainly against aircraft. The space thus saved added to simplification of supply, increased deck armor coverage, stowage of other equipment, and other needs.

German vessels such as Bismarck, by comparison, had extensive secondary anti-ship batteries AND extensive secondary anti-aircraft batteries. This tended to complicate ammunition supplies and render certain armament useless in some situations. For example, A Royal Navy battlship might have twelve five inch guns that could engage either enemy ships or high level aircraft when necessary. The Bismarck, by comparison, had a battery of 5 inch cannon that could be used against ships only, as they could not be elevated to fire on high-level targets. Another 5 inch battery was mounted to deal with air threats.

Despite the "overkill" approach the Germans took in giving Bismarck its firepower, the air threat was still underestimated and even the Bismarck's extensive aircraft defenses were inadequate to meet the technological advances made by WW2. Indeed, obsolete Fairey Swordfish biplanes were able to penetrate its heavy flak screens and deliver torpedo attacks without a single casualty. In fairness, however, the Bismarck was certainly more capable of defending itself against air attack than any British or American battleship -- a fact HMS Prince of Wales was to discover to her detriment when dispatched to Singapore in late December, 1941, and sunk by Japanese bombers.

However, despite all Bismarck's flaws, she was perhaps the finest battleship in the World when she entered combat in late May, 1941 -- better than Britain's King George V class, and capable of meeting the Americans' later South Dakota and Iowa classes on competitive terms. Limited as she was, Bismarck at least had the advantage of being new whereas most of the heavy units of the British fleet were holdovers from World War One and rapidly growing obsolete, especially in terms of speed. None of the battleships in British service had a chance of catching Bismarck -- her combination of high speed and heavy armament could have made her invincible to all but air attack, which is what eventually "did her in."

For information on the Bismarck and or Tirpitz in combat, please type "German Battleship Bismarck" or "Battleship Tirpitz" in the Misplaced Pages search engine.