| Revision as of 05:58, 3 March 2008 editMZMcBride (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users190,597 edits +vote← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:05, 3 March 2008 edit undoArrowned (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers6,058 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| *'''Keep''': None of this is original research. The only aspect that is not based in reality is the name of the page, because there is nothing else that covers all of these characters. This nomination is also malformed because there is no AFD on the page. It is just a notification on the talk page.—] (]) 05:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC) | *'''Keep''': None of this is original research. The only aspect that is not based in reality is the name of the page, because there is nothing else that covers all of these characters. This nomination is also malformed because there is no AFD on the page. It is just a notification on the talk page.—] (]) 05:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''': If there's an issue with naming, fix it. No need to delete. --] (]) 05:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC) | *'''Keep''': If there's an issue with naming, fix it. No need to delete. --] (]) 05:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''': There's no OR here, and the naming issue is a simple one to fix that should never have required an AfD. ] (]) 06:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:05, 3 March 2008
Other Rangers and Ranger-like allies
- Other Rangers and Ranger-like allies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I believe this article should not exist on Misplaced Pages because the terms used in the article witch are "Other Ranger" and "Ranger-like ally" are not official and not used by any site or anywhere i know of. What do you think?. Mythdon (talk) 03:24, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like a fannish original research festival to me. Mangoe (talk) 04:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep: None of this is original research. The only aspect that is not based in reality is the name of the page, because there is nothing else that covers all of these characters. This nomination is also malformed because there is no AFD on the page. It is just a notification on the talk page.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep: If there's an issue with naming, fix it. No need to delete. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep: There's no OR here, and the naming issue is a simple one to fix that should never have required an AfD. Arrowned (talk) 06:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)