| Revision as of 05:52, 7 March 2008 editKakofonous (talk | contribs)6,956 edits →RfA nom page created: stupid me← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:53, 7 March 2008 edit undoToddst1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors137,716 edits {{Rfa-notice}}Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Rfa-notice}} | |||
| {{talkheader}}<br>{{userinfo}} | {{talkheader}}<br>{{userinfo}} | ||
Revision as of 16:53, 7 March 2008
 | This user is currently being considered for adminship. To view the discussion and voice your opinion, please visit Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Toddst1. |
| This is Toddst1's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
 Archives |
RfA nom page created
Kakofonous would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Kakofonous to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Toddst1 . If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.Kakofonous (talk) 02:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- You forgot to accept! --Kakofonous (talk) 05:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Shall I transclude or do you want to? --Kakofonous (talk) 05:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Nevermind...wrote this while you were doing it. Kakofonous (talk) 05:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Shall I transclude or do you want to? --Kakofonous (talk) 05:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Long Xuyen
Because this is an editor from Vietnam, and presumably they know who is notable and who isn't (and those redlinks, consequently, would lead to articles). If you want to know who the people are, just ask the editor. WP editing shouldn't be a combat. Badagnani (talk) 02:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Not meant to be combative, rather, dealing with vandalism. Specifically, this edit was flagged by Lupin's anti-vandal tool which brought me to the article. After reverting the vandalism, I thought would clean the article up. I'm surprised you're seeing it differently - especially since I said what I was doing, following which policies, in my edit summary. Toddst1 (talk) 02:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh, that edit is disturbing. Probably the editor is about 14 years old. However, there may be good mixed with the bad. Badagnani (talk) 03:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. 8-) Cheers! Toddst1 (talk) 03:11, 7 March 2008 (UTC)