Misplaced Pages

User talk:Toddst1: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:22, 8 March 2008 editToddst1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors137,716 edits Mea culpa.← Previous edit Revision as of 13:32, 8 March 2008 edit undoToddst1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors137,716 edits Spell checkers: I've amended my edit to User talk: Yung_chuckNext edit →
Line 30: Line 30:
Hi - just been reviewing some of your contributions for your RFA nomination. I've got no problem supporting, but caught my attention. The spell checker is not a standard tool in Misplaced Pages, but seems to be an optional add-on in anti-vandal tool. See ]. It seems reasonable that a new editor wouldn't have that installed. Hope you don't mind me bringing your attention to this. It's not enough for me to worry about, so I'll <s>cast my vote</s> help to establish consensus at your RFA now. Good luck!&nbsp;—&nbsp;]<sub>&nbsp;(]|])</sub> 11:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC) Hi - just been reviewing some of your contributions for your RFA nomination. I've got no problem supporting, but caught my attention. The spell checker is not a standard tool in Misplaced Pages, but seems to be an optional add-on in anti-vandal tool. See ]. It seems reasonable that a new editor wouldn't have that installed. Hope you don't mind me bringing your attention to this. It's not enough for me to worry about, so I'll <s>cast my vote</s> help to establish consensus at your RFA now. Good luck!&nbsp;—&nbsp;]<sub>&nbsp;(]|])</sub> 11:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
:Wow. I had no idea it wasn't standard. Thanks for pointing it out. Mea culpa. ] (]) 13:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC) :Wow. I had no idea it wasn't standard. Thanks for pointing it out. Mea culpa. ] (]) 13:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
::I've amended my edit to ]. ] (]) 13:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:32, 8 March 2008

This user is currently being considered for adminship. To view the discussion and voice your opinion, please visit Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Toddst1.
This is Toddst1's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10


edit count | edit summary usage



Archives

User talk:Toddst1/archive3



RfA nom page created

Kakofonous would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Kakofonous to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Toddst1 . If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

Kakofonous (talk) 02:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

You forgot to accept! --Kakofonous (talk) 05:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Shall I transclude or do you want to? --Kakofonous (talk) 05:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Nevermind...wrote this while you were doing it. Kakofonous (talk) 05:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Long Xuyen

Because this is an editor from Vietnam, and presumably they know who is notable and who isn't (and those redlinks, consequently, would lead to articles). If you want to know who the people are, just ask the editor. WP editing shouldn't be a combat. Badagnani (talk) 02:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Not meant to be combative, rather, dealing with vandalism. Specifically, this edit was flagged by Lupin's anti-vandal tool which brought me to the article. After reverting the vandalism, I thought would clean the article up. I'm surprised you're seeing it differently - especially since I said what I was doing, following which policies, in my edit summary. Toddst1 (talk) 02:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, that edit is disturbing. Probably the editor is about 14 years old. However, there may be good mixed with the bad. Badagnani (talk) 03:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. 8-) Cheers! Toddst1 (talk) 03:11, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

welcome to NRHP; colonial site write-ups needed :)

Hi, welcome to WP:NRHP from a fellow member. I know I have seen your name before, probably on NRHP articles already. If you are interested in colonial NRHPs, perhaps you'd be interested to browse the work-in-progress List of National Historic Landmarks in South Carolina, which has many new stub articles that have good sources linked, but little development. Or if u have a different geographic interest, i would be happy to know. I happen to focus on the National Historic Landmarks, which is kind of an honor roll of the NRHPs; we are getting within striking range of having an informative article for every one of the 2430 or so NHLs. South Carolina happens to be in progress right now; status of all NHLs by state is reported in a table on the WP:NRHP main page. Cheers, doncram (talk) 20:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome. You came across my name when you gave me really valuable input on Belair Mansion. I hope I've effectively implemented your suggestions. I'm still hoping to get that to GA, and know I have more work to do, so I think I'm going to remain focused on that for now, but want to be a part of the project. Toddst1 (talk) 21:07, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Spell checkers

Hi - just been reviewing some of your contributions for your RFA nomination. I've got no problem supporting, but this edit caught my attention. The spell checker is not a standard tool in Misplaced Pages, but seems to be an optional add-on in anti-vandal tool. See WP:SPELL. It seems reasonable that a new editor wouldn't have that installed. Hope you don't mind me bringing your attention to this. It's not enough for me to worry about, so I'll cast my vote help to establish consensus at your RFA now. Good luck! —  Tivedshambo  (t|c) 11:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Wow. I had no idea it wasn't standard. Thanks for pointing it out. Mea culpa. Toddst1 (talk) 13:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I've amended my edit to User talk: Yung_chuck. Toddst1 (talk) 13:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)