Revision as of 16:05, 9 March 2008 editAPK (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,190 edits →March 2008: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:11, 9 March 2008 edit undoVcnez2017 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,091 edits →March 2008Next edit → | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
This is your own definition..Also see ] | This is your own definition..Also see ] | ||
:Also see ] and ]. ] (]) 16:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC) | :Also see ] and ]. ] (]) 16:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
Thanks, I have..What makes you think that I am a Sock? If you have any arguments against what I wrote, you can bring them in talk page instead of looking into my identity. If you think I am a SOCK, either you can live with that or you can consider complaining to admin. Let him decide. |
Revision as of 16:11, 9 March 2008
Welcome
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
March 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 15:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice. You don't own Wiki to define what constitute Vandalism and what is not based on your needs, is it? I had only included reasoned arguments, if you have any objections, you can discuss about it in the talk page..Reverting quite a lot of revisions without giving any reason constitutes vandalism. Until that time, please consider using sandbox by yourself Zencv (talk) 15:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- When you add phrases such as "awards from right-wing groups" without citing a source for your claim, even after you've been asked to cite and still do it, then yeah it's vandalism. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 16:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
This is your own definition..Also see hypocrisy
- Also see WP:3RR and WP:SOCK. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 16:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, I have..What makes you think that I am a Sock? If you have any arguments against what I wrote, you can bring them in talk page instead of looking into my identity. If you think I am a SOCK, either you can live with that or you can consider complaining to admin. Let him decide.