Misplaced Pages

talk:Requests for comment/DotSix: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:18, 27 July 2005 editAncheta Wis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users39,282 edits Note to DotSix  Revision as of 11:24, 27 July 2005 edit undoAncheta Wis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users39,282 edits copy the addtional information from the RFC page to this discussion pageNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
:#DotSix, you should note the ''italicized'' instructions on RFC page. A transgression against these instructions is treated as direct evidence for the proceedings. ] 11:18, 27 July 2005 (UTC) :#DotSix, you should note the ''italicized'' instructions on RFC page. A transgression against these instructions is treated as direct evidence for the proceedings. ] 11:18, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
----
I am including the following information from the RFC page in case it is better form to have this information on the discussion page. 11:24, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
*{{user|67.182.157.6}}, calls himself "DotSix". Also editing from:
**{{user|207.200.116.67}}
**{{user|207.200.116.133}} note the similarity of annotation to 172.195.53.33: no personal note except a simple IP address, clearly a platform from which to launch messages. Also, note his 7/23/05 annotation "...in accord with the actual state of affairs" is terminology used by 67.182.157.6 and no other party to the dispute. | |
**{{user|207.200.116.14}}
**{{user|207.200.116.130}}
**{{user|207.200.116.196}}
**{{user|207.200.116.7}}
**{{user|207.200.116.198}}
**{{user|172.195.53.33}} talk page announces a battle: "You may fire when ready, Gridley." note the similarity of annotation to 207.200.116.133
----
----

Revision as of 11:24, 27 July 2005

  1. DotSix, you should note the italicized instructions on RFC page. A transgression against these instructions is treated as direct evidence for the proceedings. Ancheta Wis 11:18, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

I am including the following information from the RFC page in case it is better form to have this information on the discussion page. 11:24, 27 July 2005 (UTC)