Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/J. Hunter Johnson: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:39, 29 September 2006 editMailer diablo (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators55,576 edits Closing debate; result was keep← Previous edit Revision as of 05:50, 10 March 2008 edit undoFrozenPurpleCube (talk | contribs)9,603 edits changing old signature to new username as part of Vanish using AWBNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
===]=== ===]===
This article has been prod'ed, de-prodded, speedied, de-speedied, discussed on the talk page, etc. It's not clear to me whether its subject meets ], so let us discuss it. (], ]). 15:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC) This article has been prod'ed, de-prodded, speedied, de-speedied, discussed on the talk page, etc. It's not clear to me whether its subject meets ], so let us discuss it. (], ]). 15:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''weak delete''' as there's certainly a number of books and other works published by the author, but I'm not sure if there is enough for notability. ] 16:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC) *'''weak delete''' as there's certainly a number of books and other works published by the author, but I'm not sure if there is enough for notability. ] 16:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''comment''' as the author (in violation of ], explained on the Talk page), I won't vote, but the nominator for deletion appears to have done so in retaliation for my nomination of ] for speedy delete. Number of works doesn't appear to be a criterion, just "who received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work". Some reviews: *'''comment''' as the author (in violation of ], explained on the Talk page), I won't vote, but the nominator for deletion appears to have done so in retaliation for my nomination of ] for speedy delete. Number of works doesn't appear to be a criterion, just "who received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work". Some reviews:
*: *:
Line 19: Line 19:
*: *:
*:Some of the books have reviews on Amazon as well, but I'm not sure if they "count", so I'll leave them out. -- ] 17:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC) *:Some of the books have reviews on Amazon as well, but I'm not sure if they "count", so I'll leave them out. -- ] 17:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
::Oh, so you made Gtoons? Could you tell them to fix it? :) Still, it's a bit troublesome to have you as the subject and author of the article, though I don't think you are doing anything specifically improper, and I understand your desire to not be confused with other people named Hunter Johnson. So if anybody else wants to chime in to keep it, I'll go with them. ] 17:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC) ::Oh, so you made Gtoons? Could you tell them to fix it? :) Still, it's a bit troublesome to have you as the subject and author of the article, though I don't think you are doing anything specifically improper, and I understand your desire to not be confused with other people named Hunter Johnson. So if anybody else wants to chime in to keep it, I'll go with them. ] 17:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
:::If any of the other J. Hunter Johnsons (there's a lawyer in Texas, and a newspaper editor from 1904) gets a page, then I'm in trouble. (I have gotten them to fix several things, but obviously not everything.) -- ] 17:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC) :::If any of the other J. Hunter Johnsons (there's a lawyer in Texas, and a newspaper editor from 1904) gets a page, then I'm in trouble. (I have gotten them to fix several things, but obviously not everything.) -- ] 17:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
::(edit conflict) '''Clarification''': I have nothing to do with ]; I presume the above comment is about the anon editor who tagged the article with speedy, prod, and then afd (but could not complete the nomination for the obvious reason that anons cannot create new pages). (], ]). 17:48, 18 September 2006 (UTC) ::(edit conflict) '''Clarification''': I have nothing to do with ]; I presume the above comment is about the anon editor who tagged the article with speedy, prod, and then afd (but could not complete the nomination for the obvious reason that anons cannot create new pages). (], ]). 17:48, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:50, 10 March 2008

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 15:39, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

J. Hunter Johnson

This article has been prod'ed, de-prodded, speedied, de-speedied, discussed on the talk page, etc. It's not clear to me whether its subject meets WP:BIO, so let us discuss it. (Liberatore, 2006). 15:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh, so you made Gtoons? Could you tell them to fix it? :) Still, it's a bit troublesome to have you as the subject and author of the article, though I don't think you are doing anything specifically improper, and I understand your desire to not be confused with other people named Hunter Johnson. So if anybody else wants to chime in to keep it, I'll go with them. FrozenPurpleCube 17:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
If any of the other J. Hunter Johnsons (there's a lawyer in Texas, and a newspaper editor from 1904) gets a page, then I'm in trouble. (I have gotten them to fix several things, but obviously not everything.) -- JHunterJ 17:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Clarification: I have nothing to do with Steve O'Keefe (attorney); I presume the above comment is about the anon editor who tagged the article with speedy, prod, and then afd (but could not complete the nomination for the obvious reason that anons cannot create new pages). (Liberatore, 2006). 17:48, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Right, sorry -- I'm familiar enough with the sequence that I didn't recognize the ambiguity... -- JHunterJ 17:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.