Misplaced Pages

User talk:Coredesat: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:01, 10 March 2008 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 5d) to User talk:Coredesat/Archive 16.← Previous edit Revision as of 13:41, 11 March 2008 edit undoRiana (talk | contribs)36,950 edits →My request for bureaucratship: new sectionNext edit →
Line 34: Line 34:


Your help is needed in planning ]! Any comments or suggestions you have are greatly appreciated. ] (]) 18:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC) Your help is needed in planning ]! Any comments or suggestions you have are greatly appreciated. ] (]) 18:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

== My request for bureaucratship ==

<div style="float:center;border-style:double;border-color:#FFFFFF;background-color:#00A693;border-width:2px;text-align:left;font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif; font-size: 95%; padding:8px; -moz-border-radius: 1em;" class="plainlinks">]
<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">Dear Coredesat, thank you for taking part in ]. As you may know, it was ] by bureaucrats. <br>I would, however, like to thank you for taking the time to voice your support, despite concerns cited by the opposition. Although RfA/B isn't really about a person, but more about the community, I was deeply touched and honoured by the outpouring of support and interest in the discussion. I can only hope that you don't feel your opinion was not considered enough - bureaucrats have to give everyone's thoughts weight. <br>I also hope that the results of this RfB lead to some change in the way we approach RfBs, and some thought about whether long-entrenched standards are a good thing in our growing and increasingly heterogenous community. <br>I was a little miserable after the results came out, so I'm going to spread the love via dancing hippos. As you do. :) <br>I remain eager to serve you as an administrator and as an editor. If at any point you see something problematic in my actions, please do not hesitate to ]. ~ ] 13:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)</font>
</div>

Revision as of 13:41, 11 March 2008

This is the talk page for leaving messages for User:Coredesat.

  • Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them a descriptive header. I will usually reply on your talk page unless there's a need for me to reply here.

Talk page guidelines

Please respect etiquette and assume good faith. Also be nice and remain civil.

My user talk archives
1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8
9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16
WPTC Newsletters

WP:METEO Active members

User:Juliancolton/Active

Hi

Ѕandahl has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

The Beatnigs

Hi, I just noticed that you deleted The Beatnigs, Michael Franti's former band, with an album on Alternative Tentacles (which I see has been re-released from the back catalog as a classic). I'm not trying to convince you it's a slam-dunk case for notability (I think it meets criterion 6, via Franti, and I think a Peel Sessions ought also to demonstrate notability), but I'm if I'd had it on my watchlist I'd certainly have asked it go to AfD. Could I convince you to undelete and send to AfD? Best regards, Pete.Hurd (talk) 07:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Pete.Hurd (talk) 20:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Hiya and Request for Deletion review

Hi there Coredesat. Thanks for all the editing work you do. I've been out of town for a while and just noticed that an article on a martial art called AMOK! was deleted. I assure you that the art is legitimate and so is its head instructor. Please advise me on how I can get this delete reverted. Thank you mudthang (talk) 14:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

DC Meetup on May 17th

Your help is needed in planning Misplaced Pages:Meetup/DC 4! Any comments or suggestions you have are greatly appreciated. The Placebo Effect (talk) 18:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

My request for bureaucratship

Dear Coredesat, thank you for taking part in my RfB. As you may know, it was not passed by bureaucrats.
I would, however, like to thank you for taking the time to voice your support, despite concerns cited by the opposition. Although RfA/B isn't really about a person, but more about the community, I was deeply touched and honoured by the outpouring of support and interest in the discussion. I can only hope that you don't feel your opinion was not considered enough - bureaucrats have to give everyone's thoughts weight.
I also hope that the results of this RfB lead to some change in the way we approach RfBs, and some thought about whether long-entrenched standards are a good thing in our growing and increasingly heterogenous community.
I was a little miserable after the results came out, so I'm going to spread the love via dancing hippos. As you do. :)
I remain eager to serve you as an administrator and as an editor. If at any point you see something problematic in my actions, please do not hesitate to call me out. ~ Riana ⁂ 13:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)