| Revision as of 18:00, 15 March 2008 editSceptre (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors79,161 edits →Woit/Stinkdiagram: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:06, 15 March 2008 edit undo利害(Li4Hai) (talk | contribs)264 edits →ThanksNext edit → | ||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
| Thanks a lot. Your senseless and baseless criticism of my wikipedia entry concerning IMPACT- Charlottesville has proven that wikipedia is not, in fact, a public encyclopedia that encourages everyone to contribute sensible, informative and interesting articles. I believe as an administrator you have a duty to engender an ethos of contribution, not lambast it with non-existent local clauses. You spend way too much time on your computer and not enough in the real world and in short, are unworthy of such a position. I will immediately lodge a complaint with whatever authorities hold you responsible, and if that does not work, your fellow peers. ] (]) 17:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC) | Thanks a lot. Your senseless and baseless criticism of my wikipedia entry concerning IMPACT- Charlottesville has proven that wikipedia is not, in fact, a public encyclopedia that encourages everyone to contribute sensible, informative and interesting articles. I believe as an administrator you have a duty to engender an ethos of contribution, not lambast it with non-existent local clauses. You spend way too much time on your computer and not enough in the real world and in short, are unworthy of such a position. I will immediately lodge a complaint with whatever authorities hold you responsible, and if that does not work, your fellow peers. ] (]) 17:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *I merely try to establish the fact that you sir, are an idiot, sir and unworthy of whatever title this sycophantic community has bestowed on you. ] (]) 18:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Woit/Stinkdiagram == | == Woit/Stinkdiagram == | ||
Revision as of 18:06, 15 March 2008
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
 | This user is busy in real life until Tax Day and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Note: Due to work obligations, my responses to comments made here may be delayed from Feb. 1 until April 15.
Please add new threads to the bottom of the page. I will reply to your talk page unless you request otherwise. I may reply to your talk page and copy my response here to preserve a thread or note that the issue has been dealt with.
Note that all threads older than 7 days will be archived. Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.
Uncivil comments may be deleted summarily.
Keep improving
Regarding with the topic:1Stop . While before me classmate is not familiar with the function of wiki and they dont put much reference. However, we are working on this and please share you tips with us to improve the creditability. Why we want to share is just because this is a new topic of our univeristy course and just taught by our professor. We want to share our view and collection of studies while gather other knowledge as well as learn from each others. Please give your helpful hand. We are not promoting anything and just want to share and build knowledge.
You're FAST!
When they say "speedy delete," you really mean business. Thanks for your vigilance!A little mollusk (talk) 05:22, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
p.s. am i improving a bit? i notice you're doing mop-up behind me. and for that i am thankful. A little mollusk (talk) 07:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Muleko
hey im not agree with the delete of my article muleko, there are things that doesnt exist yet, there are feelings which dont have name yet, and we can create them, stop reading history and start to make it, is this real 💕?, why do i have to write on somebody elses articles. this is not neutral —Preceding unsigned comment added by Folietrois (talk • contribs) 23:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Oops!
I guess our friend with the hot dog cart wasn't aware that the user whose page he chose to vandalize happens to be in control of the "block user" tab. :) Can't say we didn't try. Best, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Fred, you're one of the good ones, even during this rather stressful season here in the good old USA. :) Have a cookie. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
PMDrive1061 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Yeah, buddy! That "April 15" jumped off the page. Please stay sane. Cookies help oodles. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
LOL! Gee, I might have to ask Jimbo to give back the mop and broom I gave up. Seems like the perks have gotten a lot better, even if some of the users are still a bit odd at times. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
y did u block? Did u look 1st ?Keyshia Cole
I thought u r busy with your taxes? I guess u mean I'm 2 busy 2 bee attentive 2 detail so I'll block arbitrarily.
Did u look? The info is reliable and has reliable sources. I was in the process of adding the < ref> but the damn bot kept interjecting so I had 2 keep going back & undoing so I could see where 2 add the < ref> to! How r my changes vandalisation? I did cleanup, & made the info clearer. The info I added has sources. What is the spam that the bot has a problem with ? 70.108.92.126 (talk) 15:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Sources on Georgia Institute of Technology
Well, the Nique's archives have been up and down, but I promise you that the article exists in print form. Also, I found a copy of the msnbc article here. —Disavian (/contribs) 23:16, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Declination of WP:CSD#G4 and Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Shuanggen Jin
Hi C.Fred,
I just wanted to stop by and thank you for stopping by the deletion discussion and explaining a bit about your reasons for declining the speedy tag. Given the user's history of trying to put himself on Misplaced Pages I'm inclined to think that they were trying to simply host rather than improve the page in their userspace, but I see where you're coming from. Thanks! --jonny-mt 01:04, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Amalaki
Hey Fred - improved material for Amalaki is not self-published; it is the html version of the same monograph published in a textbook by Caldecott called "Ayurveda: The Divine Science of Life", in 2006 by medical/scientific publisher Mosby/Elsevier. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phytogreen (talk • contribs) 04:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks a lot. Your senseless and baseless criticism of my wikipedia entry concerning IMPACT- Charlottesville has proven that wikipedia is not, in fact, a public encyclopedia that encourages everyone to contribute sensible, informative and interesting articles. I believe as an administrator you have a duty to engender an ethos of contribution, not lambast it with non-existent local clauses. You spend way too much time on your computer and not enough in the real world and in short, are unworthy of such a position. I will immediately lodge a complaint with whatever authorities hold you responsible, and if that does not work, your fellow peers. Community service (talk) 17:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- I merely try to establish the fact that you sir, are an idiot, sir and unworthy of whatever title this sycophantic community has bestowed on you. Community service (talk) 18:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Woit/Stinkdiagram
The user's got a visible conflict of interest, seeing as he has edited no other page whatsoever. The first few diffs are worrying and have escalated to "revert-on-sight". Will 18:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)