Misplaced Pages

Talk:Joint criminal enterprise: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:07, 20 March 2008 editBig Bird (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,576 edits removed soapboxing← Previous edit Revision as of 20:17, 20 March 2008 edit undoGriffinSB (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,787 edits A bad articleNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


This article is, to put it bluntly, bollocks - plainly written by someone who has little knowledge of the legal issues and has a POV animus against the ICTY. I'll have a go at rewriting it from scratch (there's not much that can be salvaged). -- ] (]) 01:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC) This article is, to put it bluntly, bollocks - plainly written by someone who has little knowledge of the legal issues and has a POV animus against the ICTY. I'll have a go at rewriting it from scratch (there's not much that can be salvaged). -- ] (]) 01:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

The article is bad.I agree on everything ChrisO said.--] (]) 20:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:17, 20 March 2008

A bad article

This article is, to put it bluntly, bollocks - plainly written by someone who has little knowledge of the legal issues and has a POV animus against the ICTY. I'll have a go at rewriting it from scratch (there's not much that can be salvaged). -- ChrisO (talk) 01:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

The article is bad.I agree on everything ChrisO said.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 20:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)