Misplaced Pages

talk:Articles for deletion/Myrzakulov equations (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:33, 23 March 2008 edit92.46.69.162 (talk) SPAs← Previous edit Revision as of 07:39, 23 March 2008 edit undo92.46.69.162 (talk) SPAsNext edit →
Line 13: Line 13:
I'm concerned that when you remove the (redundant) rationales of these four SPAs (who I suspect, although ] not, to be some type of puppets), the discussion looks ''very'' different, particularly in the makeup and substance of the delete rationales. --] (]) 18:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC) I'm concerned that when you remove the (redundant) rationales of these four SPAs (who I suspect, although ] not, to be some type of puppets), the discussion looks ''very'' different, particularly in the makeup and substance of the delete rationales. --] (]) 18:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)


* It is interesting compare the comments of above mentioned users with the comments some russian users which they did in the first AfD discussion of my article (see please ]). Also these english comments absolutely same with the logic and contents of comments (in russian) which were in Russian.Wiki.(see please ] and ]). ] ] (]) 21:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC) * It is interesting compare the comments of above mentioned users with the comments some russian users which they did in the first AfD discussion of my article (see please ]). Also these english comments absolutely same with the logic and contents of comments (in russian) which were in Russian.Wiki.(see please ] and ]). ] ] (]) 21:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:39, 23 March 2008

SPAs

I am alarmed at the number of SPAs that are popping up in this deletion discussion. I am concerned not only by their effect on the discussion but by their uncanny similarity to one another. Does anyone else consider this a problem worth further investigation? --Cheeser1 (talk) 17:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Here they are, for the record:

I'd also point out that the nominator has contributed 75 edits to Misplaced Pages (excluding userspace), and 41 of them (55%) have been to this AfD (or the article in question):

I'm concerned that when you remove the (redundant) rationales of these four SPAs (who I suspect, although assume not, to be some type of puppets), the discussion looks very different, particularly in the makeup and substance of the delete rationales. --Cheeser1 (talk) 18:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)