| Revision as of 20:58, 12 January 2008 editAecis (talk | contribs)36,712 edits →Denver download← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:55, 26 March 2008 edit undoEleemosynary (talk | contribs)4,174 edits →Laser Quest reverted againNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| ==Laser Quest reverted again== | ==Laser Quest reverted again== | ||
| I have again reverted your edit to ]. You have been asked time and again to provide a ] using the term "Denver download". You still haven't provided a reliable source, after over a month. Not a single term in the LQ Slang section has been ]. Not a single one. You have made to the talk page, and you didn't bother to talk about what you should have talked about, which is the lack of sourcing. You've tried to put up a smoke screen about my "sheer laziness" and "trolling", but have you actually bothered to talk about the subject? No, you haven't. Please don't revert to restore uncited content. Remember, you want to see it included, so the burden of proving why it should be included lies on you. ]]<sup>]</sup> 20:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | I have again reverted your edit to ]. You have been asked time and again to provide a ] using the term "Denver download". You still haven't provided a reliable source, after over a month. Not a single term in the LQ Slang section has been ]. Not a single one. You have made to the talk page, and you didn't bother to talk about what you should have talked about, which is the lack of sourcing. You've tried to put up a smoke screen about my "sheer laziness" and "trolling", but have you actually bothered to talk about the subject? No, you haven't. Please don't revert to restore uncited content. Remember, you want to see it included, so the burden of proving why it should be included lies on you. ]]<sup>]</sup> 20:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==Hi Keetoowah== | |||
| Just wanted to say hello. --] (]) 07:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:55, 26 March 2008
Welcome!
Hello, Rocdahut, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ·:· Will Beback ·:· 18:56, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Anchor Baby reverts
Please DO NOT simply engage in a "revert war" without participating in discussion about this issue on the article's talk page. Also, please take care not to violate the three-revert rule, or else you may end up being temporarily blocked from editing. Richwales 19:16, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
I would take the advice above to heart. I see your new to Misplaced Pages and would like to welcome you. If you need assistance with anything - let me know. The rule of thumb is to count to ten before posting or if that doesn't work count to one hundred. I concur with your anchor baby move and will support you in this. I see no reason to use 'pejorative' in the opening context. PS. Don't let this dispute bother you. I am sure you have much to contribute here, BE BOLD AND STRIKE YOUR COURSE, is my personal motto for everything in life (and first part thereof a Misplaced Pages standard!) Best Wishes. --Northmeister 01:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi I invite you back to the talk page for Anchor Baby as we've worked out a consensus among three editors there. I would like your input on the matter, since you were involved in the discussion early on. It would help to solidfy the consensus to have your comments and hopefully support. Thanks. --Northmeister 21:38, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Denver download
Could you please indicate how the term "Denver download" is notable enough for inclusion in the article on Laser Quest? Discussion forums do not qualify as reliable sources, and cannot be used to establish the notability of a term. Googling for +"denver download" +"laser quest" gives only six hits: two forum discussions and four Misplaced Pages mirrors. Aecis 13:23, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Your own experiences with the term Denver download, or with laser quest in general, are not enough to warrant inclusion of the term. I'm sure it's a real term, what matters is whether it's verifiable. The term "Denver download" is only verifiable if you can point to reliable sources using the term within the context of laser quest. Internet forums are not reliable sources, blogs are not reliable sources, you and I are not reliable sources. Newspapers and magazines otoh would be reliable sources. If you can quote a laser quest magazine using the term, you've come a long way towards establishing verifiability, and probably the notability of the term as well. Aecis 20:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- With regards to your comments basically telling me not to edit the article if I don't play the game, please read our policy against article ownership. Secondly, our policy on verifiability applies to every single article. Insisting on verification of a laser quest related term is not a right limited to people familiar with laser quest. You haven't provided any proof of the notability of this term yet. I hope you understand that we can't just take your word for it. Aecis 20:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Could you please provide a reliable source using the term "Denver download" in connection to Laser Quest? Aecis 13:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Laser Quest reverted again
I have again reverted your edit to Laser Quest. You have been asked time and again to provide a reliable source using the term "Denver download". You still haven't provided a reliable source, after over a month. Not a single term in the LQ Slang section has been verified. Not a single one. You have made only one edit to the talk page, and you didn't bother to talk about what you should have talked about, which is the lack of sourcing. You've tried to put up a smoke screen about my "sheer laziness" and "trolling", but have you actually bothered to talk about the subject? No, you haven't. Please don't revert to restore uncited content. Remember, you want to see it included, so the burden of proving why it should be included lies on you. Aecis 20:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Keetoowah
Just wanted to say hello. --Eleemosynary (talk) 07:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC)