| Revision as of 14:43, 28 March 2008 editGiano II (talk | contribs)22,233 edits →Assessment of Little Moreton Hall, Kedleston Hall & Ascott House← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:54, 28 March 2008 edit undoRodw (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers768,612 edits →Assessment of Little Moreton Hall, Kedleston Hall & Ascott House: citations etcNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| Hi, Thanks for your message about assessing ], ] & ] as start class when reviewing all National Trust houses for the new ]. As you know these things are a subjective judgment & we are still developing the criteria at: ] which you would be very welcome to participate in. They are all good interesting articles, but as you requested a few comments on other things which could be done. Little Moreton Hall - well referenced, but more could be said about the contents (as opposed to architecture) & NT ownership (eg when did they aquire it & how) - I have put this one up to B class. Ascott House & Kedleston Hall are completely unsupported by inline citations & I feel these are needed before they could make B class. I would personally add an infobox using ], but as we discussed on ] I know you dislike these. I hope these comments are useful.— ] <sup>]</sup> 14:34, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | Hi, Thanks for your message about assessing ], ] & ] as start class when reviewing all National Trust houses for the new ]. As you know these things are a subjective judgment & we are still developing the criteria at: ] which you would be very welcome to participate in. They are all good interesting articles, but as you requested a few comments on other things which could be done. Little Moreton Hall - well referenced, but more could be said about the contents (as opposed to architecture) & NT ownership (eg when did they aquire it & how) - I have put this one up to B class. Ascott House & Kedleston Hall are completely unsupported by inline citations & I feel these are needed before they could make B class. I would personally add an infobox using ], but as we discussed on ] I know you dislike these. I hope these comments are useful.— ] <sup>]</sup> 14:34, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Thank you. I don't like info boxes, in fact I detest them. In line cites are only needed for contraversial or disputed facts, and Little Moreton Hall is notable for not having contents. ] (]) 14:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | ::Thank you. I don't like info boxes, in fact I detest them. In line cites are only needed for contraversial or disputed facts, and Little Moreton Hall is notable for not having contents. ] (]) 14:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::In line cites are only "required" for controversial or disputed facts - however they are good practice at all times, for dates, names, styles etc - these enable others to check what has been written & get further information. If you would like me to I can go through & add "citation needed" tags, but I'm sure you are aware of where they would be helpful. Perhaps an edited saying "Little Moreton Hall is notable for not having contents" would be useful?— ] <sup>]</sup> 14:54, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:54, 28 March 2008
Old messages are at
- User talk:Giano II/archive 1 (2004)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 2 (2005)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 3 (2005)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 4 (2006)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 5 (2006)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 6 (2007)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 7 (2007)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 8 (2008)
Essay: A few thoughts on writing Featured Articles
Your Email
Your email on Wednesday lifted my spirit. ;-) Let's talk more and see if we can figure out the best approach to take. I'll email you in the morning with some specific ideas to see if you think that they will work. Take care, FloNight♥♥♥ 02:40, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Assessment of Little Moreton Hall, Kedleston Hall & Ascott House
Hi, Thanks for your message about assessing Little Moreton Hall, Kedleston Hall & Ascott House as start class when reviewing all National Trust houses for the new Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Museums. As you know these things are a subjective judgment & we are still developing the criteria at: Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Museums which you would be very welcome to participate in. They are all good interesting articles, but as you requested a few comments on other things which could be done. Little Moreton Hall - well referenced, but more could be said about the contents (as opposed to architecture) & NT ownership (eg when did they aquire it & how) - I have put this one up to B class. Ascott House & Kedleston Hall are completely unsupported by inline citations & I feel these are needed before they could make B class. I would personally add an infobox using Template:Infobox Historic building, but as we discussed on Brympton d'Evercy I know you dislike these. I hope these comments are useful.— Rod 14:34, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. I don't like info boxes, in fact I detest them. In line cites are only needed for contraversial or disputed facts, and Little Moreton Hall is notable for not having contents. Giano (talk) 14:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- In line cites are only "required" for controversial or disputed facts - however they are good practice at all times, for dates, names, styles etc - these enable others to check what has been written & get further information. If you would like me to I can go through & add "citation needed" tags, but I'm sure you are aware of where they would be helpful. Perhaps an edited saying "Little Moreton Hall is notable for not having contents" would be useful?— Rod 14:54, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. I don't like info boxes, in fact I detest them. In line cites are only needed for contraversial or disputed facts, and Little Moreton Hall is notable for not having contents. Giano (talk) 14:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC)