| Revision as of 16:59, 29 March 2008 editRjd0060 (talk | contribs)33,499 edits →Hello!: dated← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:04, 29 March 2008 edit undoRTFA (talk | contribs)97 edits →SPA: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
| Thanks, dude. I wonder if it was a vandal with some sort of agenda against me...maybe I should point them to ]. ''']]''' <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 17:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | Thanks, dude. I wonder if it was a vandal with some sort of agenda against me...maybe I should point them to ]. ''']]''' <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 17:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == SPA == | |||
| I am only an SPA because Don Murphy has harassed editors in the past when it comes to editing his article. For instance, ] left because of this harassment. I explained my goal in editing as a SPA at ] as well as at ] and ]. Please try to ] that I am trying to establish Don Murphy's notability without being harassed. ] (]) 17:04, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:04, 29 March 2008
I will reply to messages left here on your talk page.
 Archives |
|
Archive 4 • Archive 5 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Question?
Is it wrong for a user (registered or not) to change the replies that one person lives on their own talk page? 91.105.221.196 did that after I left a kind reply. The change here and his reply to me after he changed my reply . I feel really offended by this it is like he/she put words in my mouth. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 04:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks again. I will be sure to do that in the future. Thanks again :) ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 18:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- I just wanted to let you know that 91.105.221.196 has vandalized Big Brother 9 (U.S.) again. I have given this user a only warning for their edits. I also reverted some of his comments on your talk page as they were acts of vandalism. (ie. changing my signature and calling me swear-paints) ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 20:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Question 2
Why was I indefinitely blocked? Was it because of username? And when will new account be activated and old account expire after a requested name change? —Preceding unsigned comment added by NW Film Center (talk • contribs) 22:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello!
Cream (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
16:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Descent 2 - semi protection of D2X-XL chapter rejected
The D2X-XL chapter of the Descent 2 article has been a target for plain vandalism or malevolent changes of its content for over a year. The issue has just started to get heated today, when a few people involved with the Descent community had decided to take this to a new level and mark the chapter as advertisement, restoring the mark whenever I remove it. You may want to take a look at that chapter. If you decide it's an advertisement, I will accept the decision. The people currently at work are however acting out of a deep personal resentment against me, and the Misplaced Pages entry is only a vehicle for their destructivity. FYI: Here is a link to a thread of the biggest English speaking Descent community forum, where the issue is discussed: http://www.descentbb.net/viewforum.php?f=37
Karx11erx (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Karx11erx (talk • contribs) 17:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- You might want to talk to the person who actually declined the protection request, User:Master of Puppets. - Rjd0060 (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Ah, ok. I'm pretty much a Misplaced Pages noob, thanks.
Karx11erx (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Karx11erx (talk • contribs) 17:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Regarding Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-03-19 National Federation of Republican Assemblies
Regarding the NFRA dispute in the mediation cabal, do I need to be doing anything else to facilitate the dialogue? CorpITGuy (talk) 23:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Question
Your response at WP:RFA. Does that mean my talk page is semi-protected or were just saying that one IP was blocked? AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 23:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- NM, while writing this I see you posted at RFA. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 23:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Freaky
Check the log. How weird is that? Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 22:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Graphology
Pseudo daoist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) still has troubles understanding what vandalism means: "When the edits are deliberately disruptive, then it is vandalism." 190.51.135.192 (talk) 01:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC) (see his talk page)
- While that statement is true, those edits aren't vandalism, and he fails to assume good faith. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Helen Shivers
I see you deleted the article, but you've yet to close the AFD. Cheers, Sarcasticidealist (talk) 09:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Re: 21656???!!!
Thanks, dude. I wonder if it was a vandal with some sort of agenda against me...maybe I should point them to WP:21655 is way too smart to be fooled by that sort of trickery. 21655 / ʃign 17:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
SPA
I am only an SPA because Don Murphy has harassed editors in the past when it comes to editing his article. For instance, H left because of this harassment. I explained my goal in editing as a SPA at Talk:Don Murphy/Archive2 as well as at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Don Murphy and Misplaced Pages talk:Deletion review/Don Murphy. Please try to assume good faith that I am trying to establish Don Murphy's notability without being harassed. RTFA (talk) 17:04, 29 March 2008 (UTC)