| Revision as of 21:19, 30 March 2008 editTheslB (talk | contribs)596 edits remove boilerplate← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:18, 30 March 2008 edit undoDie4Dixie (talk | contribs)3,574 edits edit warring questionNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award you this barnstar for your hardwork on ]. Keep it up! ''']''' ''']''' 17:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC) | |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award you this barnstar for your hardwork on ]. Keep it up! ''']''' ''']''' 17:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| == Edit warring warning=== | |||
| Saw edit history here, and wondered how you made it disappear--] (]) 22:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC) so quickly? | |||
Revision as of 22:18, 30 March 2008
This is the talk page.
Kessler
- I removed the prod from it--we do not delete clearly notable people because of COI--rather, we edit the article and make sure there are adequate sources. go look for them. If you cannot verify the books as being bestsellers, or the Polk awards, then nominate for AfD. DGG (talk) 02:36, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- Without sources, no subject is clearly notable. I have responded over at the talk page, which I am watching. TheslB (talk) 06:58, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Query on Ronald Kessler article
What additional verification do you want? All of the facts are in Who's Who in America. I do not want to make changes myself for fear of being accused of "vandalism."--Ronald Kessler —Preceding unsigned comment added by KesslerRonald (talk • contribs) 19:47, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- I would suggest putting any sources we can review in a new section on the talk page (link to them). Consult the reliable sources guideline for information on what kind of sources we are looking for. As I understand it, Who's Who compilations are generally not considered reliable sources. The main content goals we are looking to achieve are verifiability while maintaining a neutral point of view and avoiding original research. Since the topic is you, the biographies of living persons policy applies as well. As for my vandalism warning, it concerned your past removal of comments from the talk page. It is important not to do that again. With respect to editing the article itself, it is up to you how to proceed. But be sure to keep in mind the autobiography and conflict of interest guidelines. TheslB (talk) 20:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the hard work
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| I award you this barnstar for your hardwork on Jeremiah Wright. Keep it up! Grsz 11 17:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC) |
Edit warring warning=
Saw edit history here, and wondered how you made it disappear--Die4Dixie (talk) 22:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC) so quickly?