| Revision as of 14:11, 2 April 2008 editDavid Eppstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators225,798 editsm delsort← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:15, 2 April 2008 edit undoWikidemon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers36,531 edits speedy keep - bad nominationNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| The result was '''speedy keep'''. Subject is likely notable. Disruptive nomination by likely ]. ] (]) 16:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | |||
| :{{la|Michael Bounds}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Michael Bounds}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Line 7: | Line 12: | ||
| *'''Delete'''. I can't find anything either. He's written a number of papers as well, but at first glance, there's nothing that makes him stand out among other academics and meet our notability guidelines on ]. <font color="629632">]</font> <sup><font color="7733ff">]</font></sup> 11:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. I can't find anything either. He's written a number of papers as well, but at first glance, there's nothing that makes him stand out among other academics and meet our notability guidelines on ]. <font color="629632">]</font> <sup><font color="7733ff">]</font></sup> 11:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small><small>—] (]) 14:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)</small> | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small><small>—] (]) 14:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)</small> | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Revision as of 14:15, 2 April 2008
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Subject is likely notable. Disruptive nomination by likely sockpuppet account. Wikidemo (talk) 16:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Michael Bounds
- Michael Bounds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Michael Bounds' article states he is a college professor and was head of a department of an Australian university for a few years. That does not make someone notable. There are a lot of college professors out there. Furthermore there is only one link and no sourcing in the article to back up the claims. The article does not seem to establish notability. It is not verified. A good search didn't turn up a thing besides this article. He did seem to write a book on gentrification in Australia. However amazon.com seems to show it as his only published work. I should note most college professors do write and publish a book or two for the sole purposes of their own courses. That is what this book appears to be. I think the article should then be deleted. As for all the editors that have expressed concerns over my inexperience with AfDs, I hope I have herein satisfied your suggestions and concerns regarding proper listing. NewAtThis (talk) 11:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. I can't find anything either. He's written a number of papers as well, but at first glance, there's nothing that makes him stand out among other academics and meet our notability guidelines on professors. Celarnor 11:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 14:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.