| Revision as of 06:10, 17 January 2005 editJpatokal (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers20,239 edits Hepburn vs Kunrei← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:07, 5 August 2005 edit undoThecunninglinguists (talk | contribs)45 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The Hepburn-vs-Kunrei thing has been ''extensively'' debated before on Misplaced Pages, and the consensus has been that Hepburn alone in the Misplaced Pages standard. This is documented in the ], and please take a look at the ] for the rationale before you start unilaterally converting Hepburn into Kunrei. ] 06:10, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC) | Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The Hepburn-vs-Kunrei thing has been ''extensively'' debated before on Misplaced Pages, and the consensus has been that Hepburn alone in the Misplaced Pages standard. This is documented in the ], and please take a look at the ] for the rationale before you start unilaterally converting Hepburn into Kunrei. ] 06:10, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC) | ||
| Good idea ] 10:07, 5 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:07, 5 August 2005
Welcome!
Hi Everton! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Johntex 21:13, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The Hepburn-vs-Kunrei thing has been extensively debated before on Misplaced Pages, and the consensus has been that Hepburn alone in the Misplaced Pages standard. This is documented in the Manual of Style, and please take a look at the talk pages for the rationale before you start unilaterally converting Hepburn into Kunrei. Jpatokal 06:10, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)