Misplaced Pages

User talk:SWik78: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:14, 4 April 2008 editRedfarmer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,516 edits Re: Satan's Pal: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 21:02, 4 April 2008 edit undo64.46.2.216 (talk) Re: Your recent edit on Croatia Records: new sectionNext edit →
Line 33: Line 33:


Sounds good to me. I'm honestly not as familiar with deletion of redirects as other areas so was not quite sure what the usual procedure was. I decided to take it to a deletion discussion to err on the side of caution. Everyone else seems to agree with you so far, though, so I'll tag it. Cheers! ] (]) 19:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC) Sounds good to me. I'm honestly not as familiar with deletion of redirects as other areas so was not quite sure what the usual procedure was. I decided to take it to a deletion discussion to err on the side of caution. Everyone else seems to agree with you so far, though, so I'll tag it. Cheers! ] (]) 19:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

== Re: Your recent edit on Croatia Records ==

Hello,
I was actually referring to vandalism. If you check the history of the page, {{User|Rjecina}} has consistently been deleting anything that was negative towards Croatia Records. He removed 2 sections beforehand which are common knowledge to people living in Croatia (or rest of former Yugoslavia for that matter). Furthermore, (s)he classified my edits as vandalism, when in fact his edits of the page were just that (deleting a large chunk of information after a certain part of the page). So I would definitely say RVV is the proper edit information for my edit. --] (]) 21:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:02, 4 April 2008

This is SWik78's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Archiving icon
Archives

November 2007 - March 2008


Misplaced Pages:Stalking

I am sure that you know how stalking on wikipedia is not allowed. All in all between 5 and 10 users are looking all my edits and I am OK with that, but I am not OK with your stalking because of your editorial history on wikipedia. This has been my first and last warning about your stalking !!!

In my personal thinking you have created trap in article SAO Western Slavonia so that your "favorite" administrator can block me but it has failed. Somebody of other users which are stalking me will revert your trap :)--Rjecina (talk) 14:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

My reply is here. SWik78 (talk) 15:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
I also added this. SWik78 (talk) 15:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Let me see... If have recieved on 16 March revert ban and only 2 days latter you have given me first warning  ?? Yes after seeing mistake you have reverted your warning few hours latter but this has not changed fact about warning.
On other side your revert in article SAO Western Slavonia is telling many things about your editorial style !! It will be very interesting day when you write demand for becoming administrator :)
Do not worry stalking problem will be solved. --Rjecina (talk) 15:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
My reply is here. SWik78 (talk) 16:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

John Elkington

You just beat me to fixing the page link! :)--Fabrictramp (talk) 15:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Dimitrie Pompieu

Dimitrie Pompieu is really Dimitrie Pompeiu. FYI. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Cross-commenting, heh. Google really does wonders. ;-) - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:49, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Why did you remove my contribution to Croatia article?

Everybody knows that the first democratic elections were held back then and that the result was the Croatian independance. I don't understand why????--(GriffinSB) (talk) 15:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Satan's Pal

Sounds good to me. I'm honestly not as familiar with deletion of redirects as other areas so was not quite sure what the usual procedure was. I decided to take it to a deletion discussion to err on the side of caution. Everyone else seems to agree with you so far, though, so I'll tag it. Cheers! Redfarmer (talk) 19:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Your recent edit on Croatia Records

Hello, I was actually referring to vandalism. If you check the history of the page, Rjecina (talk · contribs) has consistently been deleting anything that was negative towards Croatia Records. He removed 2 sections beforehand which are common knowledge to people living in Croatia (or rest of former Yugoslavia for that matter). Furthermore, (s)he classified my edits as vandalism, when in fact his edits of the page were just that (deleting a large chunk of information after a certain part of the page). So I would definitely say RVV is the proper edit information for my edit. --64.46.2.216 (talk) 21:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)