| Revision as of 11:14, 29 April 2005 edit129.206.124.135 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:51, 8 August 2005 edit undoFDR (talk | contribs)1,193 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| Sure it is, but should not be overconsidered either. | Sure it is, but should not be overconsidered either. | ||
| All successful initiatory societies owe at least part of their appeal to the fact that their symbolism is open to a wide range of explanations -- especially if there are so many different representations as there are of the "rose croix", from a cross within a rose to five roses on a cross. Maybe someone could present a few examples? I have (from Golodowin's "Dictionary of Symbols"), but they are under the publisher's copyright. (flaig@sanctacaris.net) | All successful initiatory societies owe at least part of their appeal to the fact that their symbolism is open to a wide range of explanations -- especially if there are so many different representations as there are of the "rose croix", from a cross within a rose to five roses on a cross. Maybe someone could present a few examples? I have (from Golodowin's "Dictionary of Symbols"), but they are under the publisher's copyright. (flaig@sanctacaris.net) | ||
| I read a book called "Holy Blood and Holy Grail" that claimed that Pope John XXIII was a member of a Rosicrucian order. | |||
Revision as of 12:51, 8 August 2005
This article contains some links to redirects and unwritten articles. Please do not remove these links, or if you do save the links on this talk page. I use these links to remember what I need to write. Optim 01:16, 18 Jan 2004 (UTC)
so, go ahead. There is a lot to do :-))) Umberto
I see the name Rosenkreutz alternating with Rosencreutz. Which is it? heidimo 02:33, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)
They're interchangeable- just two differing anglicizations, both found in historical documents.
-FZ 21:27, 10 Jun 2004
Not even different anglicizations but just 17th century spelling variants. (flaig@sanctacaris.net)
Rosy Cross
Is it worth noting that the rose and cross are symbolic of the female and male genitalia? Pmurray bigpond.com 04:53, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Sure it is, but should not be overconsidered either. All successful initiatory societies owe at least part of their appeal to the fact that their symbolism is open to a wide range of explanations -- especially if there are so many different representations as there are of the "rose croix", from a cross within a rose to five roses on a cross. Maybe someone could present a few examples? I have (from Golodowin's "Dictionary of Symbols"), but they are under the publisher's copyright. (flaig@sanctacaris.net)
I read a book called "Holy Blood and Holy Grail" that claimed that Pope John XXIII was a member of a Rosicrucian order.