Revision as of 21:20, 13 April 2008 editWilliam M. Connolley (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers66,008 edits →State terrorism and the United States: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:26, 13 April 2008 edit undoSupergreenred (talk | contribs)88 edits →State terrorism and the United StatesNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Re ]. Please *don't* re-insert the deleted material, this is liable to get viewed as tendentious editing - this page is too close to page protection as it is. This article is in desperate need of trimming and re-focussing. Re-adding material that should be in sub-articles is not helping ] (]) 21:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC) | Re ]. Please *don't* re-insert the deleted material, this is liable to get viewed as tendentious editing - this page is too close to page protection as it is. This article is in desperate need of trimming and re-focussing. Re-adding material that should be in sub-articles is not helping ] (]) 21:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Please keep this on the article talk page. I have stated by objections there and aritrary mass deletions without time for discussion or consensus is worng. Also, you have abused your admin powers by editing the article to your preferences after you had locked it. If you disagree we can take this to ANI?] (]) 21:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:26, 13 April 2008
Long time anon user finally registered.
State terrorism and the United States
Re State terrorism and the United States. Please *don't* re-insert the deleted material, this is liable to get viewed as tendentious editing - this page is too close to page protection as it is. This article is in desperate need of trimming and re-focussing. Re-adding material that should be in sub-articles is not helping William M. Connolley (talk) 21:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- Please keep this on the article talk page. I have stated by objections there and aritrary mass deletions without time for discussion or consensus is worng. Also, you have abused your admin powers by editing the article to your preferences after you had locked it. If you disagree we can take this to ANI?Supergreenred (talk) 21:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)