Misplaced Pages

User talk:Aaron Schulz/Archive6: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Aaron Schulz Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:20, 9 August 2005 editGavin the Chosen (talk | contribs)664 edits assistance please← Previous edit Revision as of 10:24, 9 August 2005 edit undoGavin the Chosen (talk | contribs)664 edits I should like to apologizeNext edit →
Line 56: Line 56:


Replied to your comments on my talk page to prevent the discussion from breaking up. ] · ] 01:18, 9 August 2005 (UTC) Replied to your comments on my talk page to prevent the discussion from breaking up. ] · ] 01:18, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

==I should like to apologize==
for being, well, an idiot. I had thought pretending not to know what a puppet was was good for trying to hold cover on being not me, in an attempt to move beyond what i now condsider a bad phassae in mny wikipedia career, that being my old name. sorry if i offended.] 10:24, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:24, 9 August 2005

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Phroziac (talk) 19:16, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

George Bush poll

You asked me to explain my vote for locking the Bush article. It's pretty much what I said in the Talk page. Besides the vandalism, there is a lot of POV-war, which is people who have a point of view (or think their point of view is NPOV) and want to get it in the article. One persons deletes something and someone else puts it back in. Or rephrases it just enough to pass NPOV (e.g. "many people think that ...") and maybe, over the next several days, changes it to get their original wording back in again. And so it goes, back and forth. So we don't converge.

In a committee, when a large group has difficulty agreeing on the wording of something, it is frequently useful to give it to a small group and let them prepare a draft (the Declaration of Independence was done this way). I think this is a possible solution to the POV-wars. Lock it, give it to a task force to rewrite, and then open it up again. --Shoaler 11:33, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

May the force be with you!

File:Spirtis jedi.jpg

Thank you from your nice comments about the image of Yoda and Kenobi on my user page. I find that scene of Star Wars my favorite as well. It is when everything comes full circle and the efforts of Kenobi and Yoda to restore the Jedi and perserve the Jedi values are realized. As well I think it is a wish of many people to be able to, at the end of their lives, come back and see the sucess of something they spent their lives to foster and preserve. BCV 17:03, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

Sorry

about my grammer. I promise im better when editing articles. check out my creation SAM2 broadcaster for proof. enjoy Gavin the Chosen 16:43, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

assistance please

I have learned, though a freiend of mine, that a user called hamster sandwitch beleives i am something called a sock puppet , and by the connotation of the edit, this would seem to be a bad thing. What is a sock puppet? And if it is a bad thing, could I have some assitance in trying to tell people that i am not one of said puppets?Gavin the Chosen 19:25, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

A sockpuppet is a user(often a blocked one) who tries to create second and third acounts and use them all at once either to circumvent the block(you were blocked before) or to vote multiple times on polls so it looks like more people share the sockpuppet's opinion.

Testing for sockpuppets is done by:

  1. monitoring his/her edits to see if "other" user agree with them too much and focus on the same pages.
  2. checking the IP adress to see if multiple users have the same IP.
  3. If a user is blocked and during the block "another" user continues to advance their cause. This has to look very suspicious.

If you need me to say you are not one I need a link to the page that you are being accused of being a sockpuppet in. I will also have to check your history and the "sockpuppets"(I need his name or IP) to make sure that you are not lying. It is hard to check IPs and it doesn't always work so I probably won't do that, plus I would need to download a small program.Voice of All(MTG) 19:31, August 8, 2005 (UTC)


I wouldnt know about any casues i am furthuring. Perhaps someone is displeaed with the Fnord~ing, or perhaps someone did not like my attmepts to edit eiother Residential school or my creation of SAM2 broadcaster or my conversation on the goerge W bush article, other then that, all i have done is reagrange some manga related articles. Also,m a suitible comprimise has been found for Fnord~ing ( youll se)Gavin the Chosen 19:37, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

the knowlege of the accusation comes from an email i recieved from gab@gabrielsimon.com, in which was stated " dude, youre Prollly Gonna hafta deffend yursefl againsst some Overzeasous ppl shortly. Heres why.....Thhey thinkk ourm e, and its eems ive been pisssing them off lately. heres the beef. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Gabrielsimon/Evidence&curid=2384306&diff=20562266&oldid=20558752

-gab" This is getting rather strange.Gavin the Chosen 19:41, 8 August 2005 (UTC)


please see my talk page to see WHYGavin the Chosen 05:20, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Image:Voiceofall.jpg

Hello; the image you've got posted on your user page is a copyright violation. Content on Misplaced Pages must be made available through a GFDL-compatible license; we clearly don't have permission to redistribute the image under those terms. It's not enough to give the author credit or even to have permission for copying, we would have to have permission to redistribute altered version of the image. I seriously doubt we'd get that.

You are probably free to link to the image on R. K. Post's site, but you cannot upload it to Misplaced Pages. Please take care not to upload such images in the future. Thanks. JRM · Talk 00:42, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Directly linking to the image is fine (it won't display inline, of course). JRM · Talk 00:57, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Replied to your comments on my talk page to prevent the discussion from breaking up. JRM · Talk 01:18, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

I should like to apologize

for being, well, an idiot. I had thought pretending not to know what a puppet was was good for trying to hold cover on being not me, in an attempt to move beyond what i now condsider a bad phassae in mny wikipedia career, that being my old name. sorry if i offended.Gavin the Chosen 10:24, 9 August 2005 (UTC)