| Revision as of 23:30, 10 August 2005 editAgapetos angel (talk | contribs)2,142 editsm →Criticism: copyedit← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:50, 10 August 2005 edit undoPeter Kirby (talk | contribs)511 edits →Criticism: de-aconymizing YEC; copyediting critic's paragraph; response to bandwagon fallacy chargeNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| === Criticism === | === Criticism === | ||
| Critics assert that Sarfati can no longer be considered a scientist, basing this criticism on his writings and arguments for ] |
Critics assert that Sarfati can no longer be considered a scientist, basing this criticism on his writings and arguments for ] and the assertion that scientific methodology is not prominent in his recent work. Their reasoning is that his most notable conclusion, Young Earth Creationism, is not a hypothesis postulated under the principles of the scientific method and tested by experiment and data gathered in the field; also, Young Earth Creationism and the arguments for it are associated with ] in the majority view of scientists. They point out that the scientific community is in the best position to determine when the scientific method is being followed and, in response to supporters, that the ] is not made when appealing to a consensus of credible experts. | ||
| Supporters counter that personal beliefs, writings, and arguing in favour of controversial topics have no bearing on education, experience, and job description, and that the appellation of ] is in fact accurate, stating that he uses in his ]. Their reasoning is that his work is full of the latest scientific discoveries |
Supporters counter that personal beliefs, writings, and arguing in favour of controversial topics have no bearing on education, experience, and job description, and that the appellation of ] is in fact accurate, stating that he uses in his ]. Their reasoning is that his work is full of the latest scientific discoveries and is criticized merely because of his conclusions (which cover more than just Young Earth Creationism). They also point out that determination by majority view is the bandwagon fallacy, because facts are not determined by majority vote. | ||
| === Education === | === Education === | ||
Revision as of 23:50, 10 August 2005
Dr Jonathan Sarfati (born 1 October 1964) is a New Zealander/Australian author, editor, chess master, and scientist with a Ph.D. in Chemistry. Sarfati currently works for the Christian apologetics ministry Answers in Genesis (AiG). He is well-known for his support of Biblical creation.
Biography
Born in Ararat, Victoria, Sarfati moved to New Zealand as a child, where he became a dual national. He attended Wellington College (New Zealand), and later he graduated from Victoria University of Wellington with a B.Sc. (Hons.) in Chemistry and a Ph.D. in Chemistry, based on his thesis: A Spectroscopic Study of some Chalcogenide Ring and Cage Molecules. He has also had papers published in peer-reviewed scientific journals including co-authoring in the journal Nature on high-temperature superconductors in 1987, when he was 22 .
Writings
Ethnically Jewish, Sarfati converted to Christianity in 1984. In his writings, he describes himself as a Messianic Jew and Hebrew Christian, which he uses interchangeably (there are distinctions as well as overlap between the two movements). In 1996 he returned to Brisbane, Australia to work for the Creation Science Foundation (now Answers in Genesis) as co-editor of their magazine, Creation and the peer-reviewed TJ (Technical Journal).
Sarfati has written numerous publications, including three books. Refuting Evolution, his first book, was published in 1999, a rebuttal to the National Academy of Sciences' teachers' guidebook Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science. It has since sold more than 450,000 copies. This was followed by a sequel, Refuting Evolution 2, a response to a major PBS/Nova 7-part series and a Scientific American article. His latest book, Refuting Compromise is a rebuttal of the day-age creationist teachings of Dr Hugh Ross, who attempts to harmonize the Genesis account of creation with the majority scientific belief that the earth is billions of years old, a position which Sarfati rejects. Sarfati has also authored a number of booklets, besides contributing chapters and articles to numerous books and magazines, as well as many of the articles on the Answers in Genesis website. He is a popular speaker at churches and conferences on the issue of creation versus evolution.
Chess
In addition to his religious work, Sarfati maintains a keen interest in chess. A former New Zealand chess champion, he represented New Zealand in three Chess Olympiads, and drew with former World Champion Boris Spassky in a tournament in Wellington in 1988. He enjoys playing chess "blindfold", and has been known to play twelve such games simultaneously (see some games and photos). His FIDE ELO rating is 2310.
Sarfati was one of the top 1000 reviewers at Amazon.com. His reviews cover religious, scientific, and chess-related books.
Criticism
Critics assert that Sarfati can no longer be considered a scientist, basing this criticism on his writings and arguments for young earth creationism and the assertion that scientific methodology is not prominent in his recent work. Their reasoning is that his most notable conclusion, Young Earth Creationism, is not a hypothesis postulated under the principles of the scientific method and tested by experiment and data gathered in the field; also, Young Earth Creationism and the arguments for it are associated with pseudoscience in the majority view of scientists. They point out that the scientific community is in the best position to determine when the scientific method is being followed and, in response to supporters, that the bandwagon fallacy is not made when appealing to a consensus of credible experts.
Supporters counter that personal beliefs, writings, and arguing in favour of controversial topics have no bearing on education, experience, and job description, and that the appellation of scientist is in fact accurate, stating that he uses scientific methodology in his research. Their reasoning is that his work is full of the latest scientific discoveries and is criticized merely because of his conclusions (which cover more than just Young Earth Creationism). They also point out that determination by majority view is the bandwagon fallacy, because facts are not determined by majority vote.
Education
- B.Sc. (Hons.) in Chemistry (with condensed matter and nuclear physics papers substituted)
- Ph.D. in Spectroscopy (Chemistry)
Honors/Awards/Associations
- 1988, FIDE Master title, The International Chess Federation
Books
- Refuting Evolution ISBN 0-890512-58-2 1999 forward and introduction
- Refuting Evolution 2 ISBN 0-890513-87-2 2002 table of contents with links to chapters
- Refuting Compromise ISBN 0-890514-11-9 2004 introductory chapter and some reviews
Biography and articles
- Answers in Genesis' biography of Sarfati and list of his articles
- Interview in Creation magazine, Creation 26(3):36–41, June 2004
- Uncut chapter from In Six Days: Why Fifty Scientists Choose to Believe in Creation, ed. John F. Ashton, ISBN 0890513414, 2001
- Loving God with all your mind: logic and creation, TJ 12(2):142–151, 1998
- Biblical chronogenealogies, TJ 17(3):14–18, 2003 (defends Masoretic chronology of Gen. 5 & 11, and rejects gaps)
- Book review: Climbing Mount Improbable by Richard Dawkins, TJ 12(1):29–34, 1998
- Stem cells and Genesis, TJ 15(3):19–26, 2001 (opposes embryonic stem cell research; supports somatic/adult stem cell research)
- Olfactory design: smell and spectroscopy, TJ 12(2):137–138, 1998