| Revision as of 00:17, 23 April 2008 editMajoreditor (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,606 edits →Matsuo Bashō: Delist← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:10, 24 April 2008 edit undoShii (talk | contribs)21,017 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ::Every statement in this article is verifiable by checking the References section. Inline citations are not and have never been necessary on Misplaced Pages. ] ] 04:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | ::Every statement in this article is verifiable by checking the References section. Inline citations are not and have never been necessary on Misplaced Pages. ] ] 04:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delist'''. While Wikepedia doesn't require in-line citations for articles, it ''does'' requires them for GA listing. Please examine ], specifically 2-b. It states that a Good Article ''"provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons".'' ] (]) 00:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delist'''. While Wikepedia doesn't require in-line citations for articles, it ''does'' requires them for GA listing. Please examine ], specifically 2-b. It states that a Good Article ''"provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons".'' ] (]) 00:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ** Where exactly are those statements in this article? ] ] 05:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:10, 24 April 2008
Matsuo Bashō
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page
- Result pending I am asking for a reassessment/delisting as it fails section two of the good article criteria, "It is factually accurate and verifiable." More accurately, it fails 2b, "at minimum, provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons". With virtually no inline citations I don't see this as a GA. Wizardman 13:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- Every statement in this article is verifiable by checking the References section. Inline citations are not and have never been necessary on Misplaced Pages. Shii (tock) 04:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delist. While Wikepedia doesn't require in-line citations for articles, it does requires them for GA listing. Please examine Good Article criteria, specifically 2-b. It states that a Good Article "provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons". Majoreditor (talk) 00:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Where exactly are those statements in this article? Shii (tock) 05:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)