| Revision as of 15:00, 4 January 2004 editMorwen (talk | contribs)Administrators56,992 edits that there is confusion is dispute← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:59, 4 January 2004 edit undoMorwen (talk | contribs)Administrators56,992 edits +craykeNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| *That the english ] should be tweaked in to order ensure that historic counties 'be brought wholly within one ] or another' | *That the english ] should be tweaked in to order ensure that historic counties 'be brought wholly within one ] or another' | ||
| The latter point would mean annexing areas not part of ] to a different local authority in order that they could be part of this region, as region boundaries never split authorities. Also ] and ] would become part of the ] Region. | The latter point would mean annexing areas not part of ] to a different local authority in order that they could be part of this region, as region boundaries never split authorities. Also ] and ] would become part of the ] Region. Another minor point is the town of ], which is a traditional exclave of ], which is now part of the Yorkshire and the Humber Region. To be integrated into the ] region, it would need to be placed under the control of ]. | ||
| ===External link=== | ===External link=== | ||
Revision as of 15:59, 4 January 2004
The Association of British Counties is a pressure group in the United Kingdom dedicated to preserving the traditional counties Britain. It publishes a bi-annual journal, and despite its name is an association of people, not counties. Its president is the popular astrologer, Russell Grant.
It believes that the traditional counties are part of Britain's cultural heritage and should be preserved. To this end it has produced a postal directory putting British place names in what it considers to be the correct historic county, in additional to cross-referencing this with various other administrative areas, noting alternatives where the correct county is debatable and providing detailed discussion of these instances where they occur.
It also seeks to officially change the government terminology to bring it in line with the 1888 Local Government Act - the original piece of leglislation which created the modern administrative counties. This act specifically called them "administrative counties", and the ABC wishes to see this terminology consistently used to describe them. Also it wishes to see the term "county" stripped from most unitary authorities.
It says it wishes this to happen because it will remove what it sees as confusion that has resulted over the status of various entities termed counties since 1965. In particular, it uses scare quotes around the word 'county' when not referring to the traditional counties in order to emphasise its opposition to the use of this term.
The historic Counties of Great Britain are fundamental to our culture. Older than cathedrals, more historic than stately homes, Counties like Lincolnshire, Cornwall, Middlesex, Anglesey and Fife are basic to our life. Their names belong to the ground we tread. They are an indelible part of our history. They are important cultural entities.
Other policies include
- Compelling the Ordnance Survey to mark traditional county borders on their maps
- Making the Lieutenancy areas, (informally known as ceremonial counties, match the historic ones
- That the english regions should be tweaked in to order ensure that historic counties 'be brought wholly within one region or another'
The latter point would mean annexing areas not part of Yorkshire and the Humber to a different local authority in order that they could be part of this region, as region boundaries never split authorities. Also North East Lincolnshire and North Lincolnshire would become part of the East Midlands Region. Another minor point is the town of Crayke, which is a traditional exclave of County Durham, which is now part of the Yorkshire and the Humber Region. To be integrated into the North East England region, it would need to be placed under the control of Durham County Council.