| Revision as of 21:34, 4 January 2004 editMorwen (talk | contribs)Administrators56,992 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:01, 5 January 2004 edit undoOwain (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users28,441 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| The '''Association of British Counties''' is a pressure group in the ] dedicated to preserving the ] ]. It publishes a bi-annual journal, and despite its name is an association of people, not counties. Its president is the popular ], ]. | The '''Association of British Counties''' is a pressure group in the ] dedicated to preserving the ] of ]. It publishes a bi-annual journal, and despite its name is an association of people, not counties. Its president is the popular ], ]. | ||
| It believes that the traditional counties are part of Britain's cultural heritage and should be preserved. To this end it has produced a postal directory putting British place names in what it considers to be the correct historic county, in additional to cross-referencing this with various other administrative areas, noting alternatives where the correct county is debatable and providing detailed discussion of these instances where they occur. | It believes that the traditional counties are part of Britain's cultural heritage and should be preserved. To this end it has produced a postal directory putting British place names in what it considers to be the correct historic county, in additional to cross-referencing this with various other administrative areas, noting alternatives where the correct county is debatable and providing detailed discussion of these instances where they occur. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| Other policies include | Other policies include | ||
| *Compelling the ] to mark traditional county borders on their maps | *Compelling the ] to mark traditional county borders on their maps | ||
| *Making the ] match the historic ones, and thus abolishing the centuries old office of ] of ] | *Making the ] match the historic ones, and thus abolishing the centuries old office of ] of ]. <i>(The Local Government Act 1972 already did that and much worse - Bristol, Haverfordwest, &c can still have Lieutenancies, but so can Huntingdonshire, Montgomeryshire, &c - also centuries-old offices)</i> | ||
| *That the English ] should be tweaked in to order ensure that historic counties 'be brought wholly within one ] or another' | *That the English ] should be tweaked in to order ensure that historic counties 'be brought wholly within one ] or another' | ||
Revision as of 20:01, 5 January 2004
The Association of British Counties is a pressure group in the United Kingdom dedicated to preserving the traditional counties of Britain. It publishes a bi-annual journal, and despite its name is an association of people, not counties. Its president is the popular astrologer, Russell Grant.
It believes that the traditional counties are part of Britain's cultural heritage and should be preserved. To this end it has produced a postal directory putting British place names in what it considers to be the correct historic county, in additional to cross-referencing this with various other administrative areas, noting alternatives where the correct county is debatable and providing detailed discussion of these instances where they occur.
It also seeks to officially change the government terminology to bring it in line with the 1888 Local Government Act - the original piece of leglislation which created the modern administrative counties. This act specifically called them "administrative counties", and the ABC wishes to see this terminology consistently used to describe them. Also it wishes to see the term "county" stripped from most unitary authorities.
It says it wishes this to happen because it will remove what it sees as confusion that has resulted over the status of various entities termed counties since 1965. In particular, it uses scare quotes around the word 'county' when not referring to the traditional counties in order to emphasise its opposition to the use of this term.
The historic Counties of Great Britain are fundamental to our culture. Older than cathedrals, more historic than stately homes, Counties like Lincolnshire, Cornwall, Middlesex, Anglesey and Fife are basic to our life. Their names belong to the ground we tread. They are an indelible part of our history. They are important cultural entities.
Other policies include
- Compelling the Ordnance Survey to mark traditional county borders on their maps
- Making the ceremonial counties match the historic ones, and thus abolishing the centuries old office of Lord-Lieutenant of Bristol. (The Local Government Act 1972 already did that and much worse - Bristol, Haverfordwest, &c can still have Lieutenancies, but so can Huntingdonshire, Montgomeryshire, &c - also centuries-old offices)
- That the English regions should be tweaked in to order ensure that historic counties 'be brought wholly within one region or another'
The latter point would mean various local authorities would need to be changed. Currently the border between the London region and the South-East straddles numerous traditional borders - so London and the South-East region would probably need to be merged. Areas not part of Yorkshire and the Humber would be moved to a different local authority in order that they could be part of this region, as region boundaries never split authorities. Also North East Lincolnshire and North Lincolnshire would become part of the East Midlands Region. Another minor point is the town of Crayke, which is a traditional exclave of County Durham, which is now part of the Yorkshire and the Humber Region. To be integrated into the North East England region, it would need to be placed under the control of Durham County Council.