| Revision as of 14:14, 1 May 2005 editTimrollpickering (talk | contribs)Administrators351,864 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:57, 13 August 2005 edit undo81.178.121.62 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| This article is hardly balanced | This article is hardly balanced | ||
| It's largely factual, is it not? | :It's largely factual, is it not? --] 22:06, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ::Factual is not the same as balanced. It depends whose facts you use | ||
| --] 22:06, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :::What suggestions do you have? This is a very new article, based largely on ]s entry. --] 22:45, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | Factual is not the same as balanced. It depends whose facts you use | ||
| ⚫ | ::::Since next to nothing has been offered the article not being NPOV, can I propose to remove the tag until any time that someone actually puts forward a stronger case. If there are no objections, I'll do so in 24 hours. ] 14:14, 1 May 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | What suggestions do you have? This is a very new article, based largely on ]s entry. | ||
| --] 22:45, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | Since next to nothing has been offered the article not being NPOV, can I propose to remove the tag until any time that someone actually puts forward a stronger case. If there are no objections, I'll do so in 24 hours. ] 14:14, 1 May 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:57, 13 August 2005
This article is hardly balanced
- It's largely factual, is it not? --Coffeelover 22:06, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Factual is not the same as balanced. It depends whose facts you use
- What suggestions do you have? This is a very new article, based largely on UCL Unions entry. --Coffeelover 22:45, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Since next to nothing has been offered the article not being NPOV, can I propose to remove the tag until any time that someone actually puts forward a stronger case. If there are no objections, I'll do so in 24 hours. Timrollpickering 14:14, 1 May 2005 (UTC)