| Revision as of 08:14, 14 August 2005 editKappa (talk | contribs)36,858 edits →[]: keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:26, 14 August 2005 edit undoKarmosin (talk | contribs)4,752 edits →[]: Delete.Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| *'''Delete''' fanfic, collaborative or otherwise. Heh...I just nominated the same thing in my fandom for VFD just now, too. - ] (] | ]) 06:41, 14 August 2005 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' fanfic, collaborative or otherwise. Heh...I just nominated the same thing in my fandom for VFD just now, too. - ] (] | ]) 06:41, 14 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''', individual pieces of fanfic may not be notable, but whole genres of it are. ] 08:14, 14 August 2005 (UTC) | *'''Keep''', individual pieces of fanfic may not be notable, but whole genres of it are. ] 08:14, 14 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete.''' We most certainly do not need more Harry Potter articles. / ] <sup>]</sup> 10:26, 14 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:26, 14 August 2005
Harry Potter RPGs
Do we really need an article on every kind of message board role-playing game or collaborative fan fiction project? Not notable outside of their own communities. Delete. -Sean Curtin 05:45, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete fanfic, collaborative or otherwise. Heh...I just nominated the same thing in my fandom for VFD just now, too. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 06:41, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, individual pieces of fanfic may not be notable, but whole genres of it are. Kappa 08:14, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. We most certainly do not need more Harry Potter articles. / Peter 10:26, 14 August 2005 (UTC)