| Revision as of 23:35, 3 May 2008 editCasliber (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators200,925 edits heads up← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:42, 3 May 2008 edit undoCasliber (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators200,925 edits moreNext edit → | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
| :::: My first impressions - certainly the text of the latter two articles is a little flowery and should be sobered a little. The critical issue is notability - a museum I feel is, especially if it gets a guernsey in Lonely Planet Bali or something. Really needs independent referencing. The case is a little less clear with the person, and here I guess your local skills of ascertaining reliability of local sources may help. Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 23:35, 3 May 2008 (UTC) | :::: My first impressions - certainly the text of the latter two articles is a little flowery and should be sobered a little. The critical issue is notability - a museum I feel is, especially if it gets a guernsey in Lonely Planet Bali or something. Really needs independent referencing. The case is a little less clear with the person, and here I guess your local skills of ascertaining reliability of local sources may help. Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 23:35, 3 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::: eg. The museum article needs to focus on ''what'' it is and has rather than ''who'' is behind it. Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 23:42, 3 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:42, 3 May 2008
Thanks to all who defend this page against vandals
UnbannedI'm pleased to tell you that per consensus at a discussion on the administrators' noticeboard, you have now been unbanned. You have been placed under the mentorship of me and Moreschi (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) and have been placed under the following editing restriction; "Jack Merridew (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is placed under a community editing restriction. He is required to use only one account and remain civil in all discussions. He must also refrain from interacting with White Cat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) in any discussion on the project. Any uninvolved administrator may block him for an appropriate length of time should he break any of his restrictions." I do hope you take this opportunity to go back to editing constructively and there are a number of users who have put their faith in you. Please don't let them down. Ryan Postlethwaite 11:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
{{Unblock}} -- I can't edit anything but my talk page. Cheers, User:Jack Merridew a.k.a. David 12:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Clean SlateWelcome back David - it's nice to see you have been unblocked and can continue to help improve the project. Let me know if there is anything I can help you with. Eusebeus (talk) 12:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Welcome backWelcome back, Jack/David. I missed the discussion concerning your unblocking, but there is enough support for you that my arguments weren't needed. See you around- I know you already have a couple of more high profile admins than me helping you out, but, of course, you know where I am if I can help you with anything. J Milburn (talk) 17:18, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Welcome back :) -- Ned Scott 07:59, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
BaliOK then, see what magic you can weave with this one. With your skills at English, formating and discourse you should be able to produce GAs and FAs fairly readily...Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:56, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
|