Revision as of 00:41, 5 May 2008 editGiovanni33 (talk | contribs)10,138 edits →Hi← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:45, 5 May 2008 edit undoKrzyzowiec (talk | contribs)583 edits →Jan T. Gross and NOP: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
Hi. I have a question about the arbcom case. Shouldn't the other accused parties be listed as involved?] (]) 00:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC) | Hi. I have a question about the arbcom case. Shouldn't the other accused parties be listed as involved?] (]) 00:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Jan T. Gross and NOP == | |||
Why you hate me ? I am trying to discuss articles on the talk page and make them NPOV, look at the Mordro's editions - He always delete important things and add non-reliable sources. Maybe ypou should to ban him ? He don't wanna discuss anything, he jsut change everything by himself. | |||
--] (]) 00:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:45, 5 May 2008
WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter
The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Thank you for the delivery. Anthøny 22:27, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
Hi. I just wanted to comment your comment to my request for rollback. You used this two examples: , . In number 1 just reverted a bad faith edit. The user deleted a MySpace source unreasonably. The number two example was not my opinion. It was based on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Musicians/Article guidelines#Discography section. I would like to know what am I doing wrong so that I can correct it.-- LYKANTROP 15:55, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- Response coming soon. Anthøny 22:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
To-do (for my own use)
This seems like the quickest way for a to-do. Sunday, 4 May 2008:
- Answer talk page message re. rfr rejection,
- Open rfar,
- Deal with bad-issues on the rfm,
- Recategorise Steve's 24 cat's, per request,
- Forward banned user appeal to the AC,
- Deal with email from Scep.
Anthøny 22:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Lehi (group)
Hello. Several months ago you protected this page based on my request at WP:RFPP. The editors involved tried to discuss their differences on the Talk page and I think the protection can be removed. Thank you. — ] (] · ]) 03:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Unprotected. I'm glad to see the editors involved took their dispute to a relevant DR medium and had things resolved. Good stuff. Regards, Anthøny 12:07, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
NOP
MORDOR'S Jewish beliefs make his version of the article neutral ? I don't think so, but I'm ready for compromise as on the discussion page. I made article neutral, without POV sentences and non referenced statements + Mordor's criticism about the party. I think that ban was not needed to solve this problem. I would like to remind you of Mordor's actions and that his beliefes influence Misplaced Pages's articles from up to down. I don't have anything against Jews (my uncle is a practicising Jew) but I think that Mordor have to stop spreading only his point of view on Polsih related articles. Please, look at article about NOP now :
National Revival of Poland, version - 04:04, may 4 2008.
I agree with Mordor's Criticism (which is higlhy positive to keep criticism on anything in Misplaced Pages's articles because nothing is perfect, but criticism with head and NPOV policy).
--Krzyzowiec (talk) 04:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- My short answer regarding this "I made article neutral, without POV sentences and non referenced statements". No you have removed referenced info and replaced it with unreferenced, or poorly referenced (nationalist websites, YouTube, Misplaced Pages are not reliable sources WP:RS) or simply untrue statements, such as this (Krakow "case was not classified as an offense"), when reference clearly states that, case was closed because no perpetrators were identified, and not because no offense was committed. And most important - you repeatedly inserted obvious POV such as "The movement conducted a campaign called Zakaz Pedałowania (Forbid Homosexuality) as a reaction to the homosexual movement's aggressive activities in Poland.", "NOP members work for the good wealth of Poland by reminding random Poles of their beautiful heritage" and so on. M0RD00R (talk) 08:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Mediation
Hi AGK (Anthony),
I noticed your message on mediation page as well as on Naadapriya's talke page. Do you want me to strik off the earlier issues and keep the content dispute related issues alone there? Cheers Wiki San Roze 14:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Please do. I was planning to get in touch, but since you're here, we may as well do it on this page. Formal mediation only deals with issues related to article or page content, and not to editorial conduct. Issues of the latter category cannot be addressed by mediation from the Mediation Committee. Anthøny 15:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! I have struck my earlier listing and added issues related to the content alone. Hope a proper solution is found. Thanks for your help. Wiki San Roze 19:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Great stuff. I'll have a look just now. Anthøny 20:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! I have struck my earlier listing and added issues related to the content alone. Hope a proper solution is found. Thanks for your help. Wiki San Roze 19:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Question
Where do I go to report a typo in a MediaWiki file? Cheers, Razorflame 16:11, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- I could fix it, if you wish. What is the mediawiki page? Anthøny 16:14, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what the name of the media wiki page is, but when you click on my watchlist, and then edit and view watchlist, you get to a page called edit watchlist. I noticed that the A in article isn't capitalized. Shouldn't it be capitalized? Cheers, Razorflame 16:15, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi
May I suggest protecting National Revival of Poland also? It's the part of the same conflict. Cheers. M0RD00R (talk) 00:20, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Conflict by the same users, perhaps, but the content itself, that is being disputed over, is not the same. I'm afraid I won't be protecting it; I think blocks are now warranted. Anthøny 00:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I have a question about the arbcom case. Shouldn't the other accused parties be listed as involved?Giovanni33 (talk) 00:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Jan T. Gross and NOP
Why you hate me ? I am trying to discuss articles on the talk page and make them NPOV, look at the Mordro's editions - He always delete important things and add non-reliable sources. Maybe ypou should to ban him ? He don't wanna discuss anything, he jsut change everything by himself.