Misplaced Pages

User talk:Arcticocean: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:41, 5 May 2008 editGiovanni33 (talk | contribs)10,138 edits Hi← Previous edit Revision as of 00:45, 5 May 2008 edit undoKrzyzowiec (talk | contribs)583 edits Jan T. Gross and NOP: new sectionNext edit →
Line 63: Line 63:


Hi. I have a question about the arbcom case. Shouldn't the other accused parties be listed as involved?] (]) 00:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Hi. I have a question about the arbcom case. Shouldn't the other accused parties be listed as involved?] (]) 00:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

== Jan T. Gross and NOP ==

Why you hate me ? I am trying to discuss articles on the talk page and make them NPOV, look at the Mordro's editions - He always delete important things and add non-reliable sources. Maybe ypou should to ban him ? He don't wanna discuss anything, he jsut change everything by himself.

--] (]) 00:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:45, 5 May 2008

User:AGK/Header

WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter

The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter

The WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter
Volume I, No. 7 - May 2008

April issue | June issue

Project News
  • There are currently 4,050 Good Articles listed at WP:GA.
  • The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 195 unreviewed articles. Out of 227 total nominations, 16 are on hold, 14 are under review, and two are seeking a second opinion. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance!
The oldest unreviewed articles are: Fighting Tommy Riley, Brock Lesnar, Cluj-Napoca, Wolf's Rain, Brian Kendrick, and North and South (TV serial).
The categories with the largest backlogs are: Theatre, film and drama (45), Sports and recreation (34), Music (18), Transport (15), World history (14), Politics and government (13), and Places (12).
The backlog at Good Article Reassessment currently stands at 17 articles up for re-review.
GAN Reviewer of the Month

Noble Story (talk · contribs) is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for April, based on the assessments made by Dr. Cash on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Noble Story joined Misplaced Pages on May 16, 2007. He is a big fan of the Houston Rockets, and edits many related articles, as well as articles on basketball in general. Congratulations to Noble Story (talk · contribs) on being April's GAN Reviewer of the Month!

Other outstanding reviewers during the month of April include:

Member News

There are now 212 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to the 17 new members that joined during the month of April:

This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all!

GA Topic

Do you know what a GA topic is? If you are not nodding your head, or don't know what I'm talking about, then you should pay attention to this article.

There are ten GA top-level topics (but you will spot the eleventh as this article goes along). These topics are: Arts, Language and literature, Philosophy and religion, Everyday life, Social sciences and society, Geography and places, History, Engineering and technology, Mathematics, and Natural sciences. Each of these topics are further narrowed down to more specific topics. For example, Arts can be narrowed down to Art and architecture, Music, and Theatre, film and drama. But let's not get into sub-topics in this article because of its depth.

Now you will probably ask, "I already knew this, so what is your point?" What I want to illustrate is that some people often forget a step when they promote an article to GA. After they have posted their review in the article talk page, added the article name to the corresponding topic in the good article page, increased the GA count by 1, and added the {{GA}} to article talk page, many reviewers tend to forget to add the topic parameter in {{GA}} or {{ArticleHistory}}. You can browse the topic parameter abbreviations at on this page as well as what each top-level GA topic means, because sometimes it can be chaotic and confusing to pick a topic. For example, should On the Origin of Species be placed under the Natural Science topic (because it's related to evolution), or under the Language and Literature topic (because it is a book)? The correct answer is to place it under Language and literature topic, because its categorization as a proper title supercedes other categories.

Let's go back to the page that shows GA topics; does anyone spot the eleventh topic? Yes, Category:Good articles without topic parameter is the 11th topic, only it shouldn't be there. Articles that do not have a topic parameter in either {{GA}} or {{ArticleHistory}} will be placed in this category. The topic "Uncategorized" is not very informative, is it? So if you have time, you can consider cleaning up the articles that are left in this category and move them to the appropriate category by adding a topic parameter.

That's it for this month, I hope you learned a little from it.

GA Sweeps Update

The GA Sweeps process is progressing nicely! During the month of April, a total of 26 articles were reviewed. Of that total, 15 were found to continue to meet the GA criteria, and two were delisted. There are currently six articles that are still on hold in this process, awaiting revisions. One article was exempted from review because it was promoted to FA. Two articles were exempted from review because they were already delisted by another member in the community.

We are once again recruiting new sweeps participants. Candidates should be very strong and comfortable in reviewing GA and familiar with the GA processes and criteria. If you are interested, please contact OhanaUnited for details.

Did You Know...
  • ...that there are slightly less than twice as many Good Articles as Featured Articles?
  • ...that the total number of Good Articles and Featured Articles combined is 6,085?
  • ...that different languages have different symbols representing GA? (Alemannic uses , Bavarian uses , Czech and French use , Estonian, Icelandic, and Swedish use , Esperanto and German use , Polish, Spanish, and Turkish use , Portuguese uses , Russian uses , Ukrainian uses )

Note: Lithuanian and Serbian have their own symbol but only uploaded locally. Other languages not listed above either have the same symbol as english or they don't have GA process.

From the Editors

There is currently a debate on adding a small green dot to the top right corner of all Good Articles that pass the criteria, similar to the small bronze star that is added to the top right corner of Featured Articles. Members of WikiProject Good Articles are encouraged to participate in the debate on this page.

Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue here.

Contributors to this Issue
  • Dr. Cash (Lead Editor, Distributor)
  • OhanaUnited (Article, GA Sweeps and Did You Know correspondent)

Improving Misplaced Pages one article at a time since 2005!

WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks
This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Misplaced Pages.
Good article criteria | Statistics | GAN Report | Changes log
Nominations list | edit
Thank you for the delivery. Anthøny 22:27, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi. I just wanted to comment your comment to my request for rollback. You used this two examples: , . In number 1 just reverted a bad faith edit. The user deleted a MySpace source unreasonably. The number two example was not my opinion. It was based on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Musicians/Article guidelines#Discography section. I would like to know what am I doing wrong so that I can correct it.--  LYKANTROP  15:55, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Response coming soon. Anthøny 22:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

To-do (for my own use)

This seems like the quickest way for a to-do. Sunday, 4 May 2008:

  • Answer talk page message re. rfr rejection,
  • Open rfar,
  • Deal with bad-issues on the rfm,
  • Recategorise Steve's 24 cat's, per request,
  • Forward banned user appeal to the AC,
  • Deal with email from Scep.

Anthøny 22:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Lehi (group)

Hello. Several months ago you protected this page based on my request at WP:RFPP. The editors involved tried to discuss their differences on the Talk page and I think the protection can be removed. Thank you. — ] (] · ]) 03:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Unprotected. I'm glad to see the editors involved took their dispute to a relevant DR medium and had things resolved. Good stuff. Regards, Anthøny 12:07, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

NOP

MORDOR'S Jewish beliefs make his version of the article neutral ? I don't think so, but I'm ready for compromise as on the discussion page. I made article neutral, without POV sentences and non referenced statements + Mordor's criticism about the party. I think that ban was not needed to solve this problem. I would like to remind you of Mordor's actions and that his beliefes influence Misplaced Pages's articles from up to down. I don't have anything against Jews (my uncle is a practicising Jew) but I think that Mordor have to stop spreading only his point of view on Polsih related articles. Please, look at article about NOP now :

National Revival of Poland, version - 04:04, may 4 2008.

I agree with Mordor's Criticism (which is higlhy positive to keep criticism on anything in Misplaced Pages's articles because nothing is perfect, but criticism with head and NPOV policy).

--Krzyzowiec (talk) 04:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

My short answer regarding this "I made article neutral, without POV sentences and non referenced statements". No you have removed referenced info and replaced it with unreferenced, or poorly referenced (nationalist websites, YouTube, Misplaced Pages are not reliable sources WP:RS) or simply untrue statements, such as this (Krakow "case was not classified as an offense"), when reference clearly states that, case was closed because no perpetrators were identified, and not because no offense was committed. And most important - you repeatedly inserted obvious POV such as "The movement conducted a campaign called Zakaz Pedałowania (Forbid Homosexuality) as a reaction to the homosexual movement's aggressive activities in Poland.", "NOP members work for the good wealth of Poland by reminding random Poles of their beautiful heritage" and so on. M0RD00R (talk) 08:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Mediation

Hi AGK (Anthony),

I noticed your message on mediation page as well as on Naadapriya's talke page. Do you want me to strik off the earlier issues and keep the content dispute related issues alone there? Cheers Wiki San Roze 14:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do. I was planning to get in touch, but since you're here, we may as well do it on this page. Formal mediation only deals with issues related to article or page content, and not to editorial conduct. Issues of the latter category cannot be addressed by mediation from the Mediation Committee. Anthøny 15:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! I have struck my earlier listing and added issues related to the content alone. Hope a proper solution is found. Thanks for your help. Wiki San Roze 19:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Great stuff. I'll have a look just now. Anthøny 20:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Question

Where do I go to report a typo in a MediaWiki file? Cheers, Razorflame 16:11, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

I could fix it, if you wish. What is the mediawiki page? Anthøny 16:14, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure what the name of the media wiki page is, but when you click on my watchlist, and then edit and view watchlist, you get to a page called edit watchlist. I noticed that the A in article isn't capitalized. Shouldn't it be capitalized? Cheers, Razorflame 16:15, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi

May I suggest protecting National Revival of Poland‎ also? It's the part of the same conflict. Cheers. M0RD00R (talk) 00:20, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Conflict by the same users, perhaps, but the content itself, that is being disputed over, is not the same. I'm afraid I won't be protecting it; I think blocks are now warranted. Anthøny 00:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I have a question about the arbcom case. Shouldn't the other accused parties be listed as involved?Giovanni33 (talk) 00:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Jan T. Gross and NOP

Why you hate me ? I am trying to discuss articles on the talk page and make them NPOV, look at the Mordro's editions - He always delete important things and add non-reliable sources. Maybe ypou should to ban him ? He don't wanna discuss anything, he jsut change everything by himself.

--Krzyzowiec (talk) 00:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)