| Revision as of 08:17, 15 August 2005 editDreamGuy (talk | contribs)33,601 edits removing comments that violate policy (like No personal insults or the rules of RfC on articles, like this one) is encouraged, actually← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:18, 15 August 2005 edit undoGavin the Chosen (talk | contribs)664 edits there is no insult. please respect policey, and stop removing my comments, edit war causer/.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{RFCheader|Philosophy}} | {{RFCheader|Philosophy}} | ||
| *] - DreamGuy attempting to use this and other articles as his personal soap box, about his opinion of the matter, a recent edit title was simmilar to" removing POV, and destroying items i dont need" , i would appreciate if people could assist those of us who are trying to be rational in avoiding his constant edit warring.] 07:58, 15 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *] Longstanding disputes. 08:10, August 15, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *] Dispute over use of photo. Original editor uploaded a photo of himself between Arun and his wife, tagged it as public domain, then complained when it was cropped to only show Arun that the wife should be included too. Then a separately cropped photo of the wife was introduced, and he complained that it made them look "bizarre" and demanding the photo be used uncropped or not at all (missing the implications of public domain). A separate editor did a photomanipulationg of the original to erase the person in the middle, moved the remaining people together, and then drew in a fake stubby arm to connect the darkish skinned Arun to the white hand of the missing guy on his wife's shoulder. 03:58, August 13, 2005 (UTC) | *] Dispute over use of photo. Original editor uploaded a photo of himself between Arun and his wife, tagged it as public domain, then complained when it was cropped to only show Arun that the wife should be included too. Then a separately cropped photo of the wife was introduced, and he complained that it made them look "bizarre" and demanding the photo be used uncropped or not at all (missing the implications of public domain). A separate editor did a photomanipulationg of the original to erase the person in the middle, moved the remaining people together, and then drew in a fake stubby arm to connect the darkish skinned Arun to the white hand of the missing guy on his wife's shoulder. 03:58, August 13, 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:18, 15 August 2005
- Vampire - DreamGuy attempting to use this and other articles as his personal soap box, about his opinion of the matter, a recent edit title was simmilar to" removing POV, and destroying items i dont need" , i would appreciate if people could assist those of us who are trying to be rational in avoiding his constant edit warring.Gavin the Chosen 07:58, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Arun Gandhi Dispute over use of photo. Original editor uploaded a photo of himself between Arun and his wife, tagged it as public domain, then complained when it was cropped to only show Arun that the wife should be included too. Then a separately cropped photo of the wife was introduced, and he complained that it made them look "bizarre" and demanding the photo be used uncropped or not at all (missing the implications of public domain). A separate editor did a photomanipulationg of the original to erase the person in the middle, moved the remaining people together, and then drew in a fake stubby arm to connect the darkish skinned Arun to the white hand of the missing guy on his wife's shoulder. 03:58, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
- Category_talk:Dialogues_of_Plato - debate about whether or not to change naming standard en masse. We're starting to wrap things up (I hope) and would like a few more people to weigh in on some final issues. --Girolamo Savonarola 21:29, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Truth - Revert war about changes to introductory paragraph. Edits by anonymous user involve unnecessary archiving of very recent and relevant material and editing of the comments of other users; repeated reversion and referring to the comments of others as "obscurantist" and "vandalism" . See also talk:true 21:06, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
- talk:atheism NPOV complaint about deletion of links which criticize atheism.
- Otherkin - I feel there is a severe lack of observation of verifiability and no original research in this article. Content comes mainly from a few websites which I consider dubious sources. Particularly, one editor is of the opinion that normal Misplaced Pages policy and guidelines should not apply to this article. Friday 23:31, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
- Adi Shankara — there has for some time been a battle between editors who wish to state dates for Shankara that are accepted by most scholarly authorities (religious, philosophical, and historical), and those who wish to give more weight to the very different view of a set of religious institutions connected with Shankara. 21:42, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Libertarianism. There is a proposal to move the page to Libertarianism (capitalist). Should the page retain its current location (which is more in line with common use) or should "libertarianism" be a disambiguation page between the different uses, which may be fairer? 12:32, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
- This question is not written from a NPOV, because it assumes there are different uses (that are noteworthy in an encyclopedia) of the term "libertarianism", which is a point in contention. --Serge 18:39, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Ad hominem Should the article include the neologism "Inverted Ad Hominem"? There is concern that the term itself has very rare usage and its meaning is not self-evident. It was invented several months ago by the same person who inserted it into the Misplaced Pages article. He claims that recognition of the fallacy supports its own inclusion. 09:19, 27 July 2005 (UTC)