Revision as of 18:52, 14 August 2005 editLeonig Mig (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,527 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:53, 15 August 2005 edit undoPigsonthewing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors266,061 edits rv.Next edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Several surveys were completed in the ten years after ]; however all observers recognised the challenge that the ] posed to the construction of the railway. Other lines, such as the ] had previously been built up steeper inclines, however the Birmingham and Gloucester was a mechanised commercial railway, and was intended to be worked by steam locomotives. Both ] and ] said that a general purpose steam locomotive could not work such a gradient. | Several surveys were completed in the ten years after ]; however all observers recognised the challenge that the ] posed to the construction of the railway. Other lines, such as the ] had previously been built up steeper inclines, however the Birmingham and Gloucester was a mechanised commercial railway, and was intended to be worked by steam locomotives. Both ] and ] said that a general purpose steam locomotive could not work such a gradient. | ||
Due to the Lickey problem, many investors remained sceptical and withheld funds; certain landowners asked excessive prices for land needed to construct the railway. Also, the people of ] protested the proximity of the 'iron beast' to the town. Eventually it was decided that the incline could be worked by a system of ']s'. Deals were struck with recalcitrant landlords and Bromsgrove station was built almost two miles outside the town, in |
Due to the Lickey problem, many investors remained sceptical and withheld funds; certain landowners asked excessive prices for land needed to construct the railway. Also, the people of ] protested the proximity of the 'iron beast' to the town. Eventually it was decided that the incline could be worked by a system of ']s'. Deals were struck with recalcitrant landlords and Bromsgrove station was built almost two miles outside the town, in ]. The line was authorised by Act of Parliament in ], just eleven years after the opening of the ] Railway. The line was completed by ]. | ||
== Development == | == Development == | ||
The line remains part of one of the ]'s 'mainline' railway routes (see for example ]), despite a series of changes in ownership. The original Birmingham and Gloucester company merged with the |
The line remains part of one of the ]'s 'mainline' railway routes (see for example ]), despite a series of changes in ownership. The original Birmingham and Gloucester company merged with the ] in ] to form the ]. In ] the whole become a part of the ], which later became part of the ] in the ]. The LMS, along with the rest of the UK's mainline railways, became part of ] when it was nationalised in ] by the Labour government. In ], the line was sold to ] as part of the privatisation of the ] government, and then partially returned to public ownership under ] in ]. | ||
== Reference == | == Reference == |
Revision as of 08:53, 15 August 2005
The Birmingham and Gloucester Railway is a railway route linking Birmingham to Gloucester in England.
It is one of the world's oldest mainline railways and includes the famous Lickey Incline, a two mile dead straight stretch of track running up the Lickey Ridge at a gradient of 1/37. The line was built to link the factories of Birmingham to Bristol and its docks, as well as to operate passenger services.
Origins
The idea for a line had been mooted during the construction of the Stockton & Darlington railway. There was alrady a horse drawn coal railway between Bristol and Gloucestershire, however a line running the whole distance to Birmingham was suggested. At that time, the canal journey from Birmingham to Bristol took almost a week, and the road journey, which due to expense and road quality was only really suitible for passengers, took the best part of four days.
Several surveys were completed in the ten years after 1824; however all observers recognised the challenge that the Lickey Ridge posed to the construction of the railway. Other lines, such as the Cromford and High Peak Railway had previously been built up steeper inclines, however the Birmingham and Gloucester was a mechanised commercial railway, and was intended to be worked by steam locomotives. Both Stephenson and Brunel said that a general purpose steam locomotive could not work such a gradient.
Due to the Lickey problem, many investors remained sceptical and withheld funds; certain landowners asked excessive prices for land needed to construct the railway. Also, the people of Bromsgrove protested the proximity of the 'iron beast' to the town. Eventually it was decided that the incline could be worked by a system of 'banking engines'. Deals were struck with recalcitrant landlords and Bromsgrove station was built almost two miles outside the town, in Aston Fields. The line was authorised by Act of Parliament in 1836, just eleven years after the opening of the Stockton and Darlington Railway. The line was completed by 1840.
Development
The line remains part of one of the UK's 'mainline' railway routes (see for example Cross Country Route), despite a series of changes in ownership. The original Birmingham and Gloucester company merged with the Bristol and Gloucester Railway in 1845 to form the Birmingham and Bristol Railway. In 1846 the whole become a part of the Midland Railway, which later became part of the London, Midland and Scottish Railway in the rationalisation of 1923. The LMS, along with the rest of the UK's mainline railways, became part of British Railways when it was nationalised in 1948 by the Labour government. In 1995, the line was sold to Railtrack as part of the privatisation of the Major government, and then partially returned to public ownership under Network Rail in 2003.
Reference
Maggs, C (1986) 'The Birmingham Gloucester Line', Line One Press, Cheltnam, ISBN 0-907036-10-4
Categories: