Misplaced Pages

Development criticism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:13, 6 January 2004 editR Lowry (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,229 edits a little clarification in the wording (still more to do IMO)← Previous edit Revision as of 15:23, 7 January 2004 edit undo203.109.254.40 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Antimodernism''' is a ] orientation that is somewhat difficult to define, but in essence constitutes a rejection of ] ideals and behaviours, in favour of what is perceived as a purer ] or even ]al way of life and consciousness of mind. As such, antimodernism is neither a single, definable movement nor a unified set of beliefs, but a general orientation in a person's thought. '''Antimodernism''' is a ] orientation that is somewhat difficult to define, but in essence constitutes a rejection of ] ideals and behaviours in favour of what is perceived as a purer ] or even ]al way of life and consciousness of mind. As such, antimodernism is neither a single, definable movement nor a unified set of beliefs, but a vaguely-defined gist of thought.


The term overlaps, to a degree, with ], in that both positions reject modernism. However, while antimodernism typically looks towards the past for guidance and inspiration, postmodernism's rejection of modernism is generally informed by ideals born of times closer to the present. The focus of an antimodernist's view of the importance of the past may encompass ], ], ], or merely a present continuation of an existent historical ]. This is not to say, however, that antimodernist thinking is constrained within the bounds of historical precedent in finding solutions for present and future problems. The term overlaps, to a degree, with ], in that both positions reject modernism. In a sense, antimodernism typically looks towards the past for inspiration for the direction of the future, whereas postmodernism looks towards a rejection of modernism with a (oftentimes, much) lesser orientation towards the past as a guide than of ideals borne of times closer to the present. The focus of an antimodernist's view of the importance of the past may encompass ], ], ], or merely a present continuation of an existent historical ]. This is not to say, however, that antimodernist thinking is constrained to within the bounds of historical precedent in finding solutions for present and future problems.


The notion of antimodernity was primarily born as a consequence of disillusionment with ] ] in the ], which saw one of the most dramatic periods of social change in human history. Mass ] and ] contributed to the heralding of a markedly different era within a relatively short space of time. This thereby created an environment that was conducive to the rise of ] alternative to a mainstream which was far removed from the social and cultural assumptions of generations from merely decades before. The notion of antimodernity was primarily borne as a part of disillusionment with ] ] in the ], which oversaw one of the most dramatic periods of social change in human history. Mass ] and ] contributed to the heralding of a markedly different era within a relatively short space of time. This thereby created an environment that was conducive to the rise of ] alternative to a mainstream which was far departed from what was in the hearts and minds of generations in their prime merely decades before.


While not necessarily anti-technology by nature, antimodernists typically either consider technology's utilisation in the modern world to be misapplied and misguided, or else that it should be regarded as a lesser priority in human endeavour than, say, social cohesion or adherence to traditional religious and other cultural values. At the far side of the spectrum, some individuals characterisable as being antimodernist would consider all technology beyond a certain level of advancement as being ]ic in either a literal or practical sense. While not necessarily being anti-] by nature, antimodernism typically either considers technology's utilisation in the modern world to be misapplied and misguided, or else that it should be regarded as a lesser priority of human endeavour than, say, social cohesion or devotion to traditional religious and other cultural values. At the far side of the spectrum, some individuals characterisable as being antimodernist would consider all technology beyond a certain level of advancement as being ]ic in either a literal or practical sense.


Antimodernity in today's world is often popularly known of in the form of ], with more militant forms of ] and right-wing ] gaining more prominentcy during the ]. Various ]-religion/cultural orientations could be considered to be antimodernist, along with various ] groups that take more militant interpretations of these values. Not all antimodernist thought exists alongside religion, with ]ic ] being one such example.
''See also: ], ], ], ]'', ]

== External Links ==
*

''See also: ], ], ], ]'', ], ]

Revision as of 15:23, 7 January 2004

Antimodernism is a philosophical orientation that is somewhat difficult to define, but in essence constitutes a rejection of modernist ideals and behaviours in favour of what is perceived as a purer historical or even prehistorical way of life and consciousness of mind. As such, antimodernism is neither a single, definable movement nor a unified set of beliefs, but a vaguely-defined gist of thought.

The term overlaps, to a degree, with postmodernism, in that both positions reject modernism. In a sense, antimodernism typically looks towards the past for inspiration for the direction of the future, whereas postmodernism looks towards a rejection of modernism with a (oftentimes, much) lesser orientation towards the past as a guide than of ideals borne of times closer to the present. The focus of an antimodernist's view of the importance of the past may encompass religion, culture, nationalism, or merely a present continuation of an existent historical social-structure. This is not to say, however, that antimodernist thinking is constrained to within the bounds of historical precedent in finding solutions for present and future problems.

The notion of antimodernity was primarily borne as a part of disillusionment with Europe's industrial revolution in the 19th century, which oversaw one of the most dramatic periods of social change in human history. Mass urbanisation and industrialisation contributed to the heralding of a markedly different era within a relatively short space of time. This thereby created an environment that was conducive to the rise of ideologies alternative to a mainstream which was far departed from what was in the hearts and minds of generations in their prime merely decades before.

While not necessarily being anti-technology by nature, antimodernism typically either considers technology's utilisation in the modern world to be misapplied and misguided, or else that it should be regarded as a lesser priority of human endeavour than, say, social cohesion or devotion to traditional religious and other cultural values. At the far side of the spectrum, some individuals characterisable as being antimodernist would consider all technology beyond a certain level of advancement as being demonic in either a literal or practical sense.

Antimodernity in today's world is often popularly known of in the form of religious fundamentalism, with more militant forms of Islamism and right-wing Christianity gaining more prominentcy during the 1990s. Various pagan-religion/cultural orientations could be considered to be antimodernist, along with various far-right groups that take more militant interpretations of these values. Not all antimodernist thought exists alongside religion, with atheistic primitivism being one such example.

External Links

See also: Amish, The Lord Of The Rings, Luddite, Religious fundamentalism, Modernist Crisis, Unabomber