| Revision as of 20:53, 6 May 2008 edit193.120.116.179 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:31, 7 May 2008 edit undo193.120.116.180 (talk) removed blabberings of retard who had this ip before me...the asshole got me blocked, this is dynamic. don't revert please, you can see this is genuineNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|I'm just going to vandalise this place unless I'm permabanned so you might aswell lift the block now| | {{unblock reviewed|I'm just going to vandalise this place unless I'm permabanned so you might aswell lift the block now| | ||
| decline=Not a valid reason to unblock. ]<sup>(])</sup> 18:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)}} | decline=Not a valid reason to unblock. ]<sup>(])</sup> 18:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)}} | ||
| == Partially censored version of removed text == | |||
| There must be a record, this is an encyclopedia after all. Since the reason given was foul language all foul language has been removed from the text. If any offensive words were left behind it would be better to replace it with the text "deleted" and link it to the wikipedia page about the offending word. ] (]) 20:35, 6 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Stop removing what I said from my talk page. It is very rude. I will forgive you since you probably have Aspergers and don't know that you are being rude. The following was removed from the talk page. Now lets hope that this is not removed again okay? Good boy 193.120.116.180 (talk) 18:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| You're all stupid ]. lololololol 193.120.116.180 (talk) 17:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| (With regards a warning they put in the wrong heading) You put it in the wrong box you ]. You vandal! 193.120.116.180 (talk) 17:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| PLEASE block me! 193.120.116.180 (talk) 17:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| (Then they replied) OK. | |||
| (10,000 minute block announcement here) | |||
| YES! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! ] YEAH. I just ] all over my screen, what a ] rush. I can't wait to do this again in 10,000 minutes. 193.120.116.180 (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Look at how scared they were of me that they censored my talk page! My ban will be lifted soon you ]! Ahahahahahahaha!193.120.116.180 (talk) 17:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I am very sad that they blocked my account indefinitely without any warnings after I had done a lot of relevent edits. Apparantly ] gets very upset when someone vanadalises feminism related articles. Take note people ] (]) 20:35, 6 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:31, 7 May 2008
March 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CardinalDan (talk) 18:46, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Alphabeat has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. -- lucasbfr 00:28, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages as you did here. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. Bogger (talk) 15:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
April 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Rice College has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Calvin 1998 21:47, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you add defamatory content once again, as you did to Ballyroan, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Toddst1 (talk) 15:11, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hi, the recent edit you made to Image talk:2000 Year Temperature Comparison.png has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoyadds 17:36, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Database constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 17:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC))
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Eerste Divisie 2007-08. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Q 17:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Misogyny. Thingg 17:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
18:03, 6 May 2008 can;t come soon enough! I'm gonna vandalise wikipedia so hard it won;t know which way is up 193.120.116.180 (talk) 17:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Seriously guys
193.120.116.180 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm just going to vandalise this place unless I'm permabanned so you might aswell lift the block now
Decline reason:
Not a valid reason to unblock. MaxSem 18:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.