Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 16:38, 9 May 2008 editPiotrus (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,860 edits req citations, please do not remove the tags← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:35, 9 May 2008 edit undoElan26 (talk \| contribs)2,258 edits →Reception Next edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	==Reception==		==Reception==
			{{POV\|date=May 2008}}
	], a Polish-American think tank, has carried out an analysis of the reception of ''Fear''. It has concluded that "the reviewers in major newspapers such as the ], ] and the ], none of whom has any expertise in Polish or East Central European history, have reacted to the book and its thesis with uncritical acclaim and considerable ] rhetoric."<ref name="intro"></ref> "The thesis of the book is highly controversial and many Poles and others also find it unfair and tendentious".<ref name="purpose"></ref> According to the Piast Institute, some of the reviews in popular press were highly emotional and "even libelous", and might have damaged ].<ref name="intro"/><ref name="purpose"/>		], a Polish-American think tank, has carried out an analysis of the reception of ''Fear''. It has concluded that "the reviewers in major newspapers such as the ], ] and the ], none of whom has any expertise in Polish or East Central European history, have reacted to the book and its thesis with uncritical acclaim and considerable ] rhetoric."<ref name="intro"></ref> "The thesis of the book is highly controversial and many Poles and others also find it unfair and tendentious".<ref name="purpose"></ref> According to the Piast Institute, some of the reviews in popular press were highly emotional and "even libelous", and might have damaged ].<ref name="intro"/><ref name="purpose"/>

Revision as of 17:35, 9 May 2008

Fear - Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz is a book by Jan T. Gross, published by Random House in 2006. It is an expansion of themes from his 2001 book Neighbors. In Fear, Gross explores the question of post-war Polish-Jewish relations, with particular focus on the anti-Jewish violence in Poland, 1944-1946. The book received international attention with reviews in major newspapers, but has also been a subject of much criticism, from Polish historians.

Content

In the English version of the book, Gross begins with a Chapter illustrating the horrors suffered by Poland during World War II including the initial partition of the country between Stalin and Hitler, the subsequent Nazi crimes and the Katyn massacre of Polish army officers by the Soviets; the Warsaw uprising of 1944, as well as the Soviet decision to postpone their advance until the German army had defeated the Polish Armia Krajowa, which resulted in the destruction of Warsaw "reduced to a pile of rubble." And finally, the abandonment of Poland knowingly consigned to half a century of Soviet communist domination by Britain and America at the Yalta Conference.

Gross estimates that 250,000 Polish Jews returned home at the end of the war. Often, they would find their property occupied by the homeless or taken over by the communist government nationalizing much of the Polish economy. He discusses the alienation, hostile atmosphere and even violence experienced by some Jews and the inability of Polish elites to prevent it. Gross makes additional claims about Kielce pogrom (see article for a more balanced analysis) arguing that the pogrom was initiated not by a mob, but by the police, and involved people from every walk of life except the highest level of government officials in the city (Fear, pp. 83-166).

Gross concludes with the controversial claim that the cause of postwar anti-Semitism in Poland was the presumed wartime participation of selected Poles, especially in rural areas, in the Nazi effort to annihilate and despoil the Jews. The fear of punishment for their own crimes, according to Gross, was what drove them to continue attacking Jews after the war (hence the title of the book).

Differences between the Polish and English edition

The Polish version was different because Gross assumed that his Polish readers were familiar with the tragic history of wartime Poland. The English-version first chapter was replaced by a chapter documenting Polish awareness of the Nazi genocide of the Jews. In particular, Gross makes his Polish readers aware that the Einsatzgruppen rounded up Jewish men, women and children and committed mass murders in "full view" of the Polish population. In a dialogue with Deborah Lipstadt at YIVO on May 8, 2008, Gross stated that he now feels that he should have made a different decision about what to inculde in the Polish edition.

Reception

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (May 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Piast Institute, a Polish-American think tank, has carried out an analysis of the reception of Fear. It has concluded that "the reviewers in major newspapers such as the New York Times, The Baltimore Sun and the Los Angeles Times, none of whom has any expertise in Polish or East Central European history, have reacted to the book and its thesis with uncritical acclaim and considerable anti-Polish rhetoric." "The thesis of the book is highly controversial and many Poles and others also find it unfair and tendentious". According to the Piast Institute, some of the reviews in popular press were highly emotional and "even libelous", and might have damaged Polish-Jewish relations.

Fear has caused much controversy in Poland (where it was published in 2008). It got mixed media reception nevertheless it contributed to a debate about the incidents of antisemitism in post war Poland. It has been criticized by historians such as Paweł Machcewicz, Piotr Gontarczyk, Thaddeus Radzilowski, Janusz Kurtyka, Dariusz Stola and Marek Jan Chodakiewicz; accusing Gross of imperfect methodology, generalizations, stereotyping, ignoring works which did not confirm his views, neglecting the wider context of the events (Jews were not the only subject of persecution and banditry including in other countries of postwar Europe), misinterpreting or distorting data, relying mostly on Jewish sources, using inflammatory and emotional language and drawing unsubstantiated conclusions. Polish historians from the Institute of National Remembrance pointed out that due to its serious methodological errors including the use of epithets the book does not stand a chance of being accepted (even conditionally) among the scientific community.

Polish prosecutors have reviewed the accusations that the book is slanderous against the Polish nation, but rejected the claim, refusing to launch an investigation. This has become the subject of some additional media controversy. The article of the Polish law that allowed the case to be made in the first place has been criticized by some as infringing upon the right to free speech and will be reviewed by the Polish Constitutional Court.

Citations

^ Symposium: Analysis of Fear - Summary of the Essay
^ Piotr Gontarczyk, Far From Truth, Rzeczpospolita, January 12, 2008 Template:En icon
^ Symposium: Analysis of Fear - Introduction
^ Symposium: Analysis of Fear - Symposium's Purpose
^ Craig Whitlock, A Scholar's Legal Peril in Poland, Washington Post Foreign Service, Friday, January 18, 2008; Page A14
^ THADDEUS RADZILOWSKI, Review of FEAR
^ Template:Pl icon Konrad Piasecki, "Gross to wampir historiografii," interview with historian Janusz Kurtyka, RMF FM, 10 January 2008
^ Dariusz Stolam Review of Fear, in The English Historical Review 2007 CXXII(499):1460-1463; doi:10.1093/ehr/cem344
^ Marek Jan Chodakiewicz: People’s past has to be reviewed critically on individual basis, Rzeczpospolita, January 11, 2008 Template:En icon
Template:Pl icon Nie będzie śledztwa ws. książki Grossa Wprost 24

Categories:

Misplaced Pages