Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Eye movement in ordinary tasks: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:03, 19 May 2008 editHans-Werner34 (talk | contribs)271 edits Eye movement in ordinary tasks← Previous edit Revision as of 01:06, 20 May 2008 edit undoKleenupKrew (talk | contribs)1,323 edits Eye movement in ordinary tasks: deleteNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
I plan to add other examples to add to this article. I had already added one (eye movements in walking), but this was deleted without apparent reason. I plan to add other examples to add to this article. I had already added one (eye movements in walking), but this was deleted without apparent reason.
I originally planned to add articles on eye-movements in language reading, in stress situations, in in chess - translated and adapted from my publication Hans-Werner Hunziker, (2006) Im Auge des Lesers: foveale und periphere Wahrnehmung - vom Buchstabieren zur Lesefreude Transmedia Stäubli Verlag Zürich 2006 ISBN 978-3-7266-0068-6. Now I do not know if this is against Misplaced Pages standards even if I cite the original sources on which the articles in my book are based. Maybe someone can help me with this. Thanks.--] (]) 10:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC) I originally planned to add articles on eye-movements in language reading, in stress situations, in in chess - translated and adapted from my publication Hans-Werner Hunziker, (2006) Im Auge des Lesers: foveale und periphere Wahrnehmung - vom Buchstabieren zur Lesefreude Transmedia Stäubli Verlag Zürich 2006 ISBN 978-3-7266-0068-6. Now I do not know if this is against Misplaced Pages standards even if I cite the original sources on which the articles in my book are based. Maybe someone can help me with this. Thanks.--] (]) 10:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Original research. ] (]) 01:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:06, 20 May 2008

Eye movement in ordinary tasks

Eye movement in ordinary tasks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Prod declined by author; escalating to next deletion step. Strange history - author originally cited his/her own work, then changed it. Too specific of an article title/subject with little supporting text - article consists of pictures and explanations. Probably WP:COPYVIO of new cited paper, but hard to tell as it's in German. Tan | 39 21:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

I plan to add other examples to add to this article. I had already added one (eye movements in walking), but this was deleted without apparent reason. I originally planned to add articles on eye-movements in language reading, in stress situations, in in chess - translated and adapted from my publication Hans-Werner Hunziker, (2006) Im Auge des Lesers: foveale und periphere Wahrnehmung - vom Buchstabieren zur Lesefreude Transmedia Stäubli Verlag Zürich 2006 ISBN 978-3-7266-0068-6. Now I do not know if this is against Misplaced Pages standards even if I cite the original sources on which the articles in my book are based. Maybe someone can help me with this. Thanks.--Hans-Werner34 (talk) 10:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Categories: