| Revision as of 15:55, 20 May 2008 editBoodlesthecat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,411 edits ce← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:26, 20 May 2008 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,784 edits →Reception: request specific citaitons and weasel clarificationNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| The ], a Polish-American think tank, held a symposium analyzing ''Fear'' and its reception. The symposium concluded that "Reviewers in major newspapers such as the ], ] and the ], none of whom has any expertise in Polish or East Central European history, have reacted to the book and its thesis with uncritical acclaim and considerable ] rhetoric. As such, it is clear already that ''Fear''will have a serious and negative effect on ] in the United States." <ref name="intro"></ref> It concludes that "the thesis of the book is highly controversial and many Poles and others also find it unfair and tendentious".<ref name="purpose"></ref> In an analysis of Rosenbaum's review (cited above), Piast Institute concluded that he "present the argument in highly emotional and hyperbolic prose and he is given to exaggeration... distorts history and truth by its exaggerations... introduces and distorts complex issues not discussed by Professor Gross...". <ref></ref> | The ], a Polish-American think tank, held a symposium analyzing ''Fear'' and its reception. The symposium concluded that "Reviewers in major newspapers such as the ], ] and the ], none of whom has any expertise in Polish or East Central European history, have reacted to the book and its thesis with uncritical acclaim and considerable ] rhetoric. As such, it is clear already that ''Fear''will have a serious and negative effect on ] in the United States." <ref name="intro"></ref> It concludes that "the thesis of the book is highly controversial and many Poles and others also find it unfair and tendentious".<ref name="purpose"></ref> In an analysis of Rosenbaum's review (cited above), Piast Institute concluded that he "present the argument in highly emotional and hyperbolic prose and he is given to exaggeration... distorts history and truth by its exaggerations... introduces and distorts complex issues not discussed by Professor Gross...". <ref></ref> | ||
| ''Fear'' has caused controversy in Poland (where it was published in 2008). The bulk of the opposition to the book has come from Poland's conservative political establishment, while others have welcomed the book's contribution to debate about Poland's past.<ref>Siobhán Dowling. ''Spiegel International''. January 18, 2008.</ref><ref name=Whitlock>Craig Whitlock, , Washington Post Foreign Service, Friday, January 18, 2008; Page A14</ref> It has been criticized by historians such as ],<ref name=Whitlock/> ],<ref name="Gont"/> ],<ref name="TRad"></ref> ],<ref name="Kurtyka"/> ]<ref name="Stola">Dariusz Stolam Review of Fear, in The English Historical Review 2007 CXXII(499):1460-1463; doi:10.1093/ehr/cem344 </ref> and ];<ref name="Choda"/><ref name=Whitlock/> accusing Gross of imperfect ],<ref name="Choda"/><ref name="Gont"/> generalizations,<ref name="Choda"/><ref name="Stola"/> stereotyping,<ref name="Choda"/> ignoring works which did not confirm his views,<ref name="Gont"/> neglecting the wider context of the events in that Jews were not a unique subject of persecution and banditry which occurred throughout postwar Europe<ref name=Whitlock/>, misinterpreting or distorting data<ref name="Gont"/><ref name="Stola"/>, relying mostly on Jewish sources,<ref name="Gont"/> using inflammatory and emotional language<ref name=Whitlock/><ref name="Gont"/><ref name="TRad"/> and drawing unsubstantiated conclusions.<ref name="Stola"/><ref name="TRad"/><ref name=Whitlock/><ref name="Choda">]: , ], January 11, 2008 {{en icon}}</ref><ref name="Gont">Piotr Gontarczyk, , ], January 12, 2008 {{en icon}}</ref> Polish historians such as Konrad Piasecki, the president of the ] noted that due to its serious ] errors and omissions, including emotive use of political ] the book does not stand a chance of being accepted (even conditionally) in the historical community.<ref name="Kurtyka">{{pl icon}} Konrad Piasecki, , RMF FM, ] ]</ref> | ''Fear'' has caused controversy in Poland (where it was published in 2008). The bulk of the opposition to the book has come from Poland's conservative political establishment,{{fact}} while others{{who?}} have welcomed the book's contribution to debate about Poland's past.<ref>Siobhán Dowling. ''Spiegel International''. January 18, 2008.</ref><ref name=Whitlock>Craig Whitlock, , Washington Post Foreign Service, Friday, January 18, 2008; Page A14</ref> It has been criticized by historians such as ],<ref name=Whitlock/> ],<ref name="Gont"/> ],<ref name="TRad"></ref> ],<ref name="Kurtyka"/> ]<ref name="Stola">Dariusz Stolam Review of Fear, in The English Historical Review 2007 CXXII(499):1460-1463; doi:10.1093/ehr/cem344 </ref> and ];<ref name="Choda"/><ref name=Whitlock/> accusing Gross of imperfect ],<ref name="Choda"/><ref name="Gont"/> generalizations,<ref name="Choda"/><ref name="Stola"/> stereotyping,<ref name="Choda"/> ignoring works which did not confirm his views,<ref name="Gont"/> neglecting the wider context of the events in that Jews were not a unique subject of persecution and banditry which occurred throughout postwar Europe<ref name=Whitlock/>, misinterpreting or distorting data<ref name="Gont"/><ref name="Stola"/>, relying mostly on Jewish sources,<ref name="Gont"/> using inflammatory and emotional language<ref name=Whitlock/><ref name="Gont"/><ref name="TRad"/> and drawing unsubstantiated conclusions.<ref name="Stola"/><ref name="TRad"/><ref name=Whitlock/><ref name="Choda">]: , ], January 11, 2008 {{en icon}}</ref><ref name="Gont">Piotr Gontarczyk, , ], January 12, 2008 {{en icon}}</ref> Polish historians such as Konrad Piasecki, the president of the ] noted that due to its serious ] errors and omissions, including emotive use of political ] the book does not stand a chance of being accepted (even conditionally) in the historical community.<ref name="Kurtyka">{{pl icon}} Konrad Piasecki, , RMF FM, ] ]</ref> | ||
| Feliks Tych, head of Warsaw's Jewish Historical Institute, criticized Gross for being more of a judge than an analyst, neglecting the impact of the collapse of ost-war collapse of state institutions, and selectively using facts that supported ''Fear'''s thesis about deeply-ingrained anti-semitism in Polish society. Tych also noted, "But after his book, it is no longer possible to escape from the question why there were killings of Jews after the war, and that is is his undeniable achievement."<ref>Beats Pasek. ''Time'', Jan. 23, 2008.</ref> | Feliks Tych, head of Warsaw's Jewish Historical Institute, criticized Gross for being more of a judge than an analyst, neglecting the impact of the collapse of ost-war collapse of state institutions, and selectively using facts that supported ''Fear'''s thesis about deeply-ingrained anti-semitism in Polish society. Tych also noted, "But after his book, it is no longer possible to escape from the question why there were killings of Jews after the war, and that is is his undeniable achievement."<ref>Beats Pasek. ''Time'', Jan. 23, 2008.</ref> | ||
Revision as of 18:26, 20 May 2008
Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz is a book by Jan T. Gross, published by Random House in 2006 in the US, and by Princeton University Press outside the US. A Polish version was published in Krakow as Strach : antysemityzm w Polsce tuż po wojnie : historia moralnej zapaści by Znak publishers in 2008. Fear is an expansion of themes from his 2001 book Neighbors. In this book, Gross explores the issues concerning post-war anti-Jewish violence in Poland, with particular focus on the 1946 Kielce pogrom. The book received international attention with reviews in major newspapers, but has also been a subject of much criticism from Polish historians.
Content
In the English version of the book, Gross begins with a chapter illustrating the horrors suffered by Poland during World War II including the physical destruction of Poland's Jews, the initial partition of the country between Stalin and Hitler, the subsequent Nazi crimes and the Katyn massacre of Polish army officers by the Soviets; the Warsaw uprising of 1944, as well as the Soviet decision to postpone their advance until the German army had defeated the Polish Armia Krajowa, which resulted in the destruction of Warsaw "reduced to a pile of rubble." And finally, the abandonment of Poland knowingly consigned to half a century of Soviet communist domination by Britain and America at the Yalta Conference.
Gross estimates that 250,000 Polish Jews returned home at the end of the war. Often, they would find their property occupied by the homeless or taken over by the communist government nationalizing much of the Polish economy. He discusses the alienation, hostile atmosphere and violence experienced by some Jews and the inability of Polish elites to prevent it. Gross makes additional claims about the Kielce pogrom, in which 40 returning Jewish Holocaust survivors were murdered in the Polish town of Kielce,) arguing that the pogrom was initiated not by a mob, but by the police, and involved people from every walk of life except the highest level of government officials in the city (Fear, pp. 83-166).
Gross concludes with the controversial claim that the cause of postwar anti-Semitism in Poland was the presumed wartime participation of selected Poles, especially in rural areas, in the Nazi effort to annihilate and despoil the Jews. The fear of punishment for their own crimes, according to Gross, was what drove them to continue attacking Jews after the war (hence the title of the book).
Differences between the Polish and English edition
The Polish version was different because Gross assumed that his Polish readers were familiar with the tragic history of wartime Poland. The English-version first chapter was replaced by a chapter documenting Polish awareness of the Nazi genocide of the Jews. In particular, Gross makes his Polish readers aware that the Einsatzgruppen rounded up Jewish men, women and children and committed mass murders in "full view" of the Polish population. In a dialogue with Deborah Lipstadt at YIVO on May 8, 2008, Gross stated that he now feels that he should have made a different decision about what to include in the Polish edition.
Reception
Fear received praise in book reviews in a number of major publications, including The New York Times Elie Wiesel in the Washington Post, the Boston Globe and the Kirkus Reviews Reviewing Fear in the Los Angeles Times, novelist and law professor Thane Rosenbaum, a son of Holocaust survivors, writes that Poland "is a nation cursed by absence" and that "Gross' Fear should inspire a national reflection on why there are scarcely any Jews left in Poland. It's never too late to mourn. The soul of the country depends on it."
The Piast Institute, a Polish-American think tank, held a symposium analyzing Fear and its reception. The symposium concluded that "Reviewers in major newspapers such as the New York Times, The Baltimore Sun and the Los Angeles Times, none of whom has any expertise in Polish or East Central European history, have reacted to the book and its thesis with uncritical acclaim and considerable anti-Polish rhetoric. As such, it is clear already that Fearwill have a serious and negative effect on Polish-Jewish relations in the United States." It concludes that "the thesis of the book is highly controversial and many Poles and others also find it unfair and tendentious". In an analysis of Rosenbaum's review (cited above), Piast Institute concluded that he "present the argument in highly emotional and hyperbolic prose and he is given to exaggeration... distorts history and truth by its exaggerations... introduces and distorts complex issues not discussed by Professor Gross...".
Fear has caused controversy in Poland (where it was published in 2008). The bulk of the opposition to the book has come from Poland's conservative political establishment, while others have welcomed the book's contribution to debate about Poland's past. It has been criticized by historians such as Paweł Machcewicz, Piotr Gontarczyk, Thaddeus Radzilowski, Janusz Kurtyka, Dariusz Stola and Marek Jan Chodakiewicz; accusing Gross of imperfect methodology, generalizations, stereotyping, ignoring works which did not confirm his views, neglecting the wider context of the events in that Jews were not a unique subject of persecution and banditry which occurred throughout postwar Europe, misinterpreting or distorting data, relying mostly on Jewish sources, using inflammatory and emotional language and drawing unsubstantiated conclusions. Polish historians such as Konrad Piasecki, the president of the Institute of National Remembrance noted that due to its serious methodological errors and omissions, including emotive use of political epithets the book does not stand a chance of being accepted (even conditionally) in the historical community.
Feliks Tych, head of Warsaw's Jewish Historical Institute, criticized Gross for being more of a judge than an analyst, neglecting the impact of the collapse of ost-war collapse of state institutions, and selectively using facts that supported Fear's thesis about deeply-ingrained anti-semitism in Polish society. Tych also noted, "But after his book, it is no longer possible to escape from the question why there were killings of Jews after the war, and that is is his undeniable achievement."
Polish prosecutors have reviewed the accusations that the book is slanderous against the Polish nation, but rejected the claim, refusing to launch an investigation. This has become the subject of some additional media controversy. The article of the Polish law that allowed the case to be made in the first place has been criticized by some as infringing upon the right to free speech and will be reviewed by the Polish Constitutional Court.
See also
Citations
- ^ Symposium: Analysis of Fear - Summary of the Essay
- ^ Piotr Gontarczyk, Far From Truth, Rzeczpospolita, January 12, 2008 Template:En icon
- David Margolick. Postwar Pogrom. The New York Times, July 23, 2006
- Elie Wiesel. The Killing After The Killing. The Washington Post, June 25, 2006.
- Susan Rubin Suleiman. Aftershocks. The Boston Globe, July 02, 2006
- Kirkus Reviews 74.9 (May 1, 2006): p448(1).
- Thane Rosenbaum, "A Lethal Homecoming" (pdf), book review of Fear, Los Angeles Times, June 25, 2006.
- Symposium: Analysis of Fear - Introduction
- Symposium: Analysis of Fear - Symposium's Purpose
- Analysis of Thane Rosenbaum's Review of FEAR
- Siobhán Dowling. Fear and Slander in Poland. Anti-Semitism Book Could Land Historian in Jail. Spiegel International. January 18, 2008.
- ^ Craig Whitlock, A Scholar's Legal Peril in Poland, Washington Post Foreign Service, Friday, January 18, 2008; Page A14
- ^ THADDEUS RADZILOWSKI, Review of FEAR
- ^ Template:Pl icon Konrad Piasecki, "Gross to wampir historiografii," interview with historian Janusz Kurtyka, RMF FM, 10 January 2008
- ^ Dariusz Stolam Review of Fear, in The English Historical Review 2007 CXXII(499):1460-1463; doi:10.1093/ehr/cem344
- ^ Marek Jan Chodakiewicz: People’s past has to be reviewed critically on individual basis, Rzeczpospolita, January 11, 2008 Template:En icon
- Beats Pasek. Confronting Poland's Anti-Semitic Demons. Time, Jan. 23, 2008.
- Template:Pl icon Nie będzie śledztwa ws. książki Grossa Wprost 24
Further reading
- David Engel, On Continuity and Discontinuity in Polish-Jewish Relations: Observations on Fear: Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz—An Essay in Historical Interpretation by Jan T. Gross. New York: Random House, 2006, East European Politics & Societies, Vol. 21, No. 3, 534-548 (2007),
Externa links
- The Killing After the Killing, Review of Fear, Washington Post
- Chasing Away the Memory of Guilt: The End of Jewish Life in Poland H-Net review of Fear
- "Polish criminal investigation into the book Fear" by European Jewish Press