| Revision as of 20:27, 20 May 2008 editBelovedfreak (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers77,904 edits →Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome: keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:43, 20 May 2008 edit undoVquex (talk | contribs)190 edits →Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome: KeepNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| *'''Keep''' It's a ''stub'' for a verifiable disease - Misplaced Pages should encourage people to add information - that's what stubs are for! No reason to delete. ] ] 20:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' It's a ''stub'' for a verifiable disease - Misplaced Pages should encourage people to add information - that's what stubs are for! No reason to delete. ] ] 20:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - plenty of ] out there to demonstrate notability. Just needs expansion by someone with that kind of knowledge. (AFD is not cleanup...)--]] 20:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' - plenty of ] out there to demonstrate notability. Just needs expansion by someone with that kind of knowledge. (AFD is not cleanup...)--]] 20:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - I'd have thought that any disease that has been documented in medical literature would qualify as notable, no matter how rare. ] (]) 21:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:43, 20 May 2008
Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome
- Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete unsourced oneliner about a rare genetic disorder without any claim to notability or even context on what is disordered or how it is manifest. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep a quick Google reveals plenty of sources, so I'm sure it could be expanded into a worthwhile article (though I'm not qualified to do so). 82.1.57.47 (talk) 18:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Here's an explanation of what it is. And there's plenty of more detailed information here. Couldn't you have just gone to a WikiProject for help? Zagalejo^^^ 18:25, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- This seems to be a somewhat more accessible explanation. Zagalejo^^^ 18:33, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- If you think it worth saving, please improve the article from its horrible condition. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- This is hardly my area of expertise. I don't want to be responsible for adding misleading medical information. It's not "horrible", though. It's a stub. They're allowed. I see you've made similar articles, like Matelot, Trinidad. Zagalejo^^^ 18:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 20:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep It's a stub for a verifiable disease - Misplaced Pages should encourage people to add information - that's what stubs are for! No reason to delete. Stephenb (Talk) 20:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - plenty of reliable sources out there to demonstrate notability. Just needs expansion by someone with that kind of knowledge. (AFD is not cleanup...)--BelovedFreak 20:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - I'd have thought that any disease that has been documented in medical literature would qualify as notable, no matter how rare. Vquex (talk) 21:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)