Misplaced Pages

talk:Requests for comment/TheNautilus: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:06, 22 May 2008 editNcmvocalist (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,127 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 12:10, 22 May 2008 edit undoJefffire (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers4,518 edits →Reply to NcmvocalistNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:


:Those core policies you mention are '''content''' policies - disputes over article content, including disputes over how best to follow the ] policy, belong in an ]. This is a request for comment on user '''conduct''', and involves conduct policies like ], ], ] etc. Please follow due process. ] (]) 12:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC) :Those core policies you mention are '''content''' policies - disputes over article content, including disputes over how best to follow the ] policy, belong in an ]. This is a request for comment on user '''conduct''', and involves conduct policies like ], ], ] etc. Please follow due process. ] (]) 12:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

::My understanding is that this isn't about how to apply policy, but refusal to understand and apply policy, which is very much a conduct issue. ] (]) 12:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:10, 22 May 2008

Reply to Ncmvocalist

Ncmvocalist would throw out all evidence of content from this dispute. However, WP:NPOV (including WP:UNDUE), WP:NOR, and WP:V are all core policies. To say that core policies cannot be discussed at RfC is nonsense. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 11:29, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps you don't understand how Misplaced Pages works in relation to dispute resolution, so I'll make it clearer for you.
Those core policies you mention are content policies - disputes over article content, including disputes over how best to follow the neutral point of view policy, belong in an Article RfC. This is a request for comment on user conduct, and involves conduct policies like WP:NPA, WP:CIVIL, WP:EDITWAR etc. Please follow due process. Ncmvocalist (talk) 12:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
My understanding is that this isn't about how to apply policy, but refusal to understand and apply policy, which is very much a conduct issue. Jefffire (talk) 12:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)