| Revision as of 03:04, 1 May 2008 editWilliamKF (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,422 edits →DYK: Move DYK← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:22, 22 May 2008 edit undo86.29.142.126 (talk) 3 revert ruleNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| Nice job expanding the Clara Clemens article. Want to take a look at the ] and ] articles as well? I couldn't find images to use with them that were not copyrighted. --] (]) 00:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | Nice job expanding the Clara Clemens article. Want to take a look at the ] and ] articles as well? I couldn't find images to use with them that were not copyrighted. --] (]) 00:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :ANY image of them is public domain in the U.S. since it had to be taken before ] ]. The appropriate tag is PD-US. ] 16:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC) | :ANY image of them is public domain in the U.S. since it had to be taken before ] ]. The appropriate tag is PD-US. ] 16:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == User talk:86.29.142.126 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 19:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:22, 22 May 2008
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Something funny with RA and Dec templates
Your recent alterations to the RA and Dec templates are very useful, but they cause footnotes to appear on a separate line from the RA and Dec. Is it possible to fix this? Thank you.
Speedy deletion of Kenneth L. Williams
A tag has been placed on Kenneth L. Williams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. KurtRaschke (talk) 22:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
By the way
I had to go through the entire page and reformat all of the cite templates. Please be careful in future to ensure that your method of citation fits with that established for the page. Serendious 18:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- I assure you, this isn't about me. I could care less. Indeed I care a lot less. But I'm currently going through an FAC and there are some seriously strict (read: completely bugf*ck insane) bylaws and style conformities I have to adhere to if I want it to succeed. So I'm not angry at you or anything, just informing you so that we collectively can get it together so we don't have to go through this again. Serendious 23:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Clara Clemens
Nice job expanding the Clara Clemens article. Want to take a look at the Susy Clemens and Jean Clemens articles as well? I couldn't find images to use with them that were not copyrighted. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 00:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- ANY image of them is public domain in the U.S. since it had to be taken before January 1 1923. The appropriate tag is PD-US. Royalbroil 16:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
User talk:86.29.142.126
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. 86.29.142.126 (talk) 19:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)