| Revision as of 20:50, 23 May 2008 editJamesMLane (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,084 edits →Pete Olson: keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:06, 23 May 2008 edit undoFrank (talk | contribs)Administrators19,998 editsm →Pete Olson: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per ]. Only and only one is actually about him. <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">] | ]</span></small> 20:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per ]. Only and only one is actually about him. <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">] | ]</span></small> 20:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. In a 10-person primary, he finished second, qualifying for a runoff. The runoff was against the winner of the 2006 special election, who had therefore held the seat for a while, yet he beat her. This is enough of an achievement to merit a bio article. Furthermore, although the current state of the article doesn't reflect it, there was certainly coverage of him, as both the primary and the runoff drew press attention. ]<small> ] ]</small> 20:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. In a 10-person primary, he finished second, qualifying for a runoff. The runoff was against the winner of the 2006 special election, who had therefore held the seat for a while, yet he beat her. This is enough of an achievement to merit a bio article. Furthermore, although the current state of the article doesn't reflect it, there was certainly coverage of him, as both the primary and the runoff drew press attention. ]<small> ] ]</small> 20:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :* '''Comment''' - apparently, ] only won the special election to serve for '''< 2 months''', and at the same time lost the general election for the following term. (An odd situation, I'd say.) <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">] | ]</span></small> 21:06, 23 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:06, 23 May 2008
Pete Olson
- Pete Olson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Candidate for Congress with no other claims to notability. Way, way too soon for an article on this guy--if he wins the election (though he might be favored), maybe we can create an article on him. Blueboy96 20:32, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BIO#Politicians - being a candidate does not confer notability. JohnCD (talk) 20:40, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTE. Only 4 gnews hits and only one is actually about him. Frank | talk 20:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. In a 10-person primary, he finished second, qualifying for a runoff. The runoff was against the winner of the 2006 special election, who had therefore held the seat for a while, yet he beat her. This is enough of an achievement to merit a bio article. Furthermore, although the current state of the article doesn't reflect it, there was certainly coverage of him, as both the primary and the runoff drew press attention. JamesMLane t c 20:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - apparently, Shelley Sekula-Gibbs only won the special election to serve for < 2 months, and at the same time lost the general election for the following term. (An odd situation, I'd say.) Frank | talk 21:06, 23 May 2008 (UTC)